Vehicle Restraint Barrier Position Monitoring and Jam Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle restraints at loading docks face issues with the hook-style restraint catching on the vehicle's ICC bar, leading to difficulties in retracting due to forward pressure, which can be resolved by continuous monitoring of the barrier's position, speed, and direction using sensors and controllers to manage the retraction process effectively.

Innovation Solution

A sensor and controller system that monitors the barrier's movement over a continuous range of positions, decelerates it as it approaches a hard stop, provides maintenance warnings, and signals the need for a 'bump-back' procedure, ensuring smooth operation and adaptability to different vehicle styles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a hook-style restraint is used to block the vehicle's ICC bar, then the vehicle is restrained from moving away from the dock, but the restraint may catch on the bar and fail to retract due to forward pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverestraint reliabilityVSAvoidretraction difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the barrier position via sensors and provides feedback to the controller. When the barrier reaches a predetermined position (indicating it has caught on the ICC bar), the controller receives position feedback and automatically initiates a bump-back sequence to resolve the jamming condition, enabling reliable operation without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The controller is programmed with predetermined positions and bump-back sequences in advance. When the barrier approaches the ICC bar, the system has already prepared the bump-back action, allowing automatic resolution of potential jamming issues before they become problematic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If the barrier moves quickly to block the vehicle, then the restraint responds rapidly, but the barrier may slam into the ICC bar causing noise and wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebarrier response speedVSAvoidimpact noise and wear
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is programmed to decelerate the barrier as it approaches the ICC bar, preventing a hard slam. This cushioning action reduces impact noise and wear on the barrier and ICC bar, while still maintaining rapid response to vehicle blocking needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The barrier movement is made dynamic rather than static - the controller adjusts the barrier speed in real-time based on its position relative to the ICC bar, transitioning from rapid movement to controlled deceleration just before contact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If the restraint system is simplified, then the device complexity is reduced, but it cannot provide continuous monitoring and control over the barrier position

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidposition monitoring accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The controller serves multiple functions: it monitors barrier position, determines when the barrier has blocked the vehicle, calculates bump-back sequences, and controls barrier movement. This multi-functionality achieves precise continuous monitoring without requiring separate dedicated components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the barrier's own movement and position feedback to automatically trigger control actions. The barrier essentially monitors itself through its position sensors, and the controller automatically responds without requiring external monitoring systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9845209B2Monitoring vehicle restraints over a continuous range of positions
Publication Date: 2017.12.19 RITE HITE HLDG CORP
  • US9845209B2 patent drawing
  • US9845209B2 patent drawing
  • US9845209B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Example vehicle restraint apparatus and methods of operating the same are disclosed herein. An example method includes moving a barrier via a vehicle restraint drive unit relative to a main body proximate the dock between a fully extended position to block the vehicle, a fully retracted position to release the vehicle, and a plurality of intermediate positions between the fully extended position and the fully retracted position; monitoring a status of the barrier as the barrier moves through the plurality of intermediate positions; comparing the status to a reference value; determining that an event has occurred based on the comparison of the status and the reference value; and providing an output in response to determining that the event has occurred.