Personal Restraint Button Double Lock Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing personal restraints, such as handcuffs and ankle cuffs, face challenges in ease of application, control, and durability, particularly in confrontational situations, with existing designs often compromising between ease of use and security.

Innovation Solution

The development of chain cuffs, hinge cuffs, and rigid cuffs using forged aluminum alloy cheek frame halves with integrated radiused edges and a polymer-infused bow for reduced trauma, along with a lockset assembly that allows for secure assembly and easy replacement, enhancing control and security while minimizing injury risk.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing personal restraint designs are used, then ease of application is maintained, but control and security are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol and securityVSAvoidease of application
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The lock bar is designed to be movable between different positions (engaged with pawl teeth, disengaged, or forced into double lock), allowing the restraint system to dynamically adapt between ease of application and enhanced security modes. The button mechanism enables operators to transition between operational states based on situational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the locking parameter state through the button mechanism, which forces the lock bar into a fixed double lock position regardless of the pawl engagement state. This parameter change (from normal locking to forced double locking) provides enhanced security while maintaining the same basic application procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If traditional locking mechanisms are used, then simplicity is maintained, but vulnerability to manipulation and accidental opening increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to manipulationVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The button mechanism performs a preliminary action by forcing the lock bar into the double lock position before normal operation begins. This pre-positioning of the lock bar in a secure state prevents manipulation attempts from the outset, as the system is already in a tamper-resistant configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The double lock position acts as a preliminary protective measure, cushioning against potential manipulation or accidental opening. By having the lock bar forced into a secure position in advance, the system prepares a safety buffer that prevents unauthorized opening even if the pawl engagement is compromised.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Strength

If standard materials are used, then manufacturing cost is controlled, but durability and trauma reduction are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The restraint system uses composite materials including polymer-infused bow and forged aluminum alloy cheek frame halves. The polymer infusion provides trauma reduction properties while the forged aluminum alloy ensures durability and strength. This combination of materials achieves both durability and trauma reduction while maintaining manufacturability through established forging and infusion processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

Different parts of the restraint system have locally optimized qualities: the bow is polymer-infused for trauma reduction where it contacts the subject, while the cheek frame halves use forged aluminum alloy for strength and durability in structural components. This local quality differentiation addresses both trauma reduction and durability requirements in their respective functional zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11713597B2Personal restraints with button double lock
Publication Date: 2023.08.01 ARMAMENT SYSTEMS & PROCEDURES INC
  • US11713597B2 patent drawing
  • US11713597B2 patent drawing
  • US11713597B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Personal restraints are described, including a user-accessible button that can be pushed in sliding a lock bar into a double lock position.