Passenger Restraint Lighting for Automated Lock Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual inspection of passenger restraints in amusement park rides is inefficient, leading to delays and potential safety concerns due to the need for operators to verify proper securing of riders before ride operation.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a passenger restraining system with a locking mechanism, proximity sensors, and a lighting system that automatically indicates whether the restraint is locked or unlocked, using embedded light sources to display different light schemes based on the locking status, and applies forces to secure passengers, enhancing both safety and operational efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual inspection of passenger restraints is used, then operators can verify proper securing of riders, but operational delays occur due to inefficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification accuracyVSAvoidride throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The restraint system automatically verifies its own locking status through integrated sensors and lighting indicators, eliminating the need for manual inspection by operators. The system self-monitors whether passengers are properly secured and communicates this status visually, allowing rapid verification without operator intervention and maintaining both safety and throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical inspection with an automated sensor-based detection system. Optical sensors or proximity sensors detect the position and locking status of restraints, converting physical states into electrical signals that trigger visual indicators. This substitution eliminates the time-consuming manual verification process while maintaining reliable detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated sensor systems are added to monitor restraint status, then verification speed improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple functions into the restraint system itself: the restraint mechanism, the sensor detection, and the visual indication are integrated into a single unified system. The lighting elements are embedded within the restraint structure, and the sensors utilize existing mechanical positions, merging detection and indication functions with the primary restraint function to minimize additional complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses simple color-coded visual indicators (e.g., green for locked, red for unlocked) to communicate restraint status. This color-change approach provides rapid, intuitive verification without requiring complex display systems or operator training, maintaining simplicity while dramatically improving verification speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

3Loss of information

If integrated lighting systems are embedded in restraints, then real-time status indication is provided, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestatus visibilityVSAvoidmanufacturing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The lighting elements are positioned locally at specific critical points on the restraint system where status indication is most needed, such as near the locking mechanism or along the restraint bar. This localized approach provides effective status visibility without requiring lighting throughout the entire restraint structure, simplifying manufacturing compared to comprehensive illumination systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system ensures rapid and accurate verification of passenger restraints, reducing operational delays and enhancing safety by providing real-time feedback on restraint status, while also improving ride throughput and passenger experience through themed lighting.

Implementation Method 1

a proximity sensor set comprising a sensing component configured to emit a signal detected by a proximity sensor of the proximity sensor set

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectProximity sensing: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentEP3615389B1Passenger restraint with integrated lighting
Publication Date: 2023.06.21 UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS LLC
  • EP3615389B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3615389B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3615389B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Present systems and methods are directed to a passenger restraining system (18), which includes a restraint and a locking mechanism (60), and a lighting system (50), which includes a variety of light sources. At least a portion of the variety of light sources is integrated with the restraint. Furthermore, the lighting system (50) receives an indication of a configuration of the locking mechanism (60), executes a first light scheme via the plurality of light sources when the indication is of an unlocked configuration, and executes a second light scheme via the plurality of light sources when the indication is of a locked configuration.