Information Processing Apparatus Restricted History Display

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional information processing apparatuses fail to maintain security while allowing the reuse of setting history information for new jobs, as they inadvertently disclose confidential information such as personal data when displaying setting screens.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus with a controller that restricts the display of restricted information from setting history, ensuring that only authorized users can access sensitive data, maintaining security while allowing convenient reuse of setting history.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If setting history information is displayed as it is for new jobs, then convenience of reuse is improved, but security is worsened due to disclosure of confidential information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvenience of reuseVSAvoidsecurity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and separates restricted information (such as personal information and confidential data) from the setting history information. When displaying the setting screen, the system removes or masks these restricted portions while preserving the remaining useful settings, thereby enabling convenient reuse without exposing sensitive data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different display qualities to different portions of the setting history information. Restricted information is masked or hidden, while non-restricted information is displayed normally. This local differentiation allows the system to maintain security for sensitive portions while preserving usability for public portions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If restricted information is removed from display, then security is improved, but completeness of setting history is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidcompleteness of setting history
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the restricted portions (personal information, confidential data) from the setting history while leaving the remaining useful settings intact. This selective extraction maintains the completeness of non-sensitive information while removing only what compromises security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism (the controller) that mediates between the stored setting history and the display output. This intermediary selectively processes the information, removing restricted portions while preserving others, thus balancing security requirements with information completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11902486B2Information processing apparatus and information processing method
Publication Date: 2024.02.13 SHARP KK
  • US11902486B2 patent drawing
  • US11902486B2 patent drawing
  • US11902486B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus includes a storage and a controller. The storage stores history information pertaining to job execution, and when the history information is read from the storage and the history information includes restricted information, the controller restricts display of the restricted information.