Test Fixture for Semiconductor Restrictor Flow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In semiconductor manufacturing, it is challenging to identify which restrictor is causing flow variance during maintenance, leading to unnecessary replacement of all restrictors and increased expenses due to scrap and inefficiency.

Innovation Solution

A test fixture system is developed that includes a body with a threaded region, a gland coupled with a threaded nut, and an outlet vented to the atmosphere, allowing for precise testing of restrictor flow control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all restrictors are replaced at once during maintenance, then flow control reliability is improved, but loss of substance and loss of time increase due to unnecessary replacements and increased scrap

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow control reliabilityVSAvoidrestrictor scrap
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the maintenance process into individual restrictor testing and identification rather than replacing all restrictors simultaneously. Each restrictor can be individually tested using the test fixture to determine if it is actually faulty, allowing selective replacement only of defective restrictors and reducing unnecessary scrap of functional components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the conventional optical-based measurement method with a flow control testing system that actually measures flow performance. This substitution enables accurate identification of faulty restrictors based on their real flow characteristics rather than visual or dimensional inspection, leading to more accurate maintenance decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If all restrictors are replaced at once during maintenance, then flow control reliability is improved, but loss of time increases due to unnecessary replacements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow control reliabilityVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables segmented testing of each restrictor individually using the test fixture, allowing maintenance personnel to identify only the defective restrictors that need replacement. This eliminates the need to replace all restrictors simultaneously, significantly reducing maintenance time while ensuring reliable flow control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The test fixture provides feedback on the actual flow performance of each restrictor, enabling informed decisions about which restrictors need replacement. This feedback mechanism prevents unnecessary replacements and reduces maintenance time by focusing only on defective components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If optical-based method is used to measure restrictor diameter, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates since flow variations are seen on restrictors labeled as having the same diameter

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection easeVSAvoidflow control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces optical-based dimensional measurement with actual flow control testing using a test fixture that measures the functional flow performance of restrictors. This substitution provides precise measurement of actual flow characteristics, revealing variations that optical methods miss, while remaining operationally feasible through automated flow measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent shifts the measurement parameter from physical diameter (optical method) to flow rate (functional test). By measuring the actual flow parameter rather than the dimensional parameter, the system achieves superior measurement precision that directly reflects restrictor performance, eliminating false positives in restrictor identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250110019A1Methods and system for flow control testing
Publication Date: 2025.04.03 ASM IP HLDG BV
  • US20250110019A1 patent drawing
  • US20250110019A1 patent drawing
  • US20250110019A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of the present technology may provide a test fixture for testing flow of a restrictor. The test fixture may be coupled downstream from a flow control assembly. The test fixture may include a body with a threaded region and a gland coupled to the body with a threaded nut. The text fixture outlet may be vented to the atmosphere.