Result-Based Content Triggering in Search Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current search engines lack the ability to effectively manipulate content presentation based on characteristics of search results, limiting their capacity to infer user interest and promote relevant content beyond the query scope.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that allows for rules-based content manipulation by identifying dominant characteristics in search results, applying triggers and thresholds to modify the result set, and presenting additional content based on these characteristics, even if they are not explicitly included in the user's query.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If search engines present results ranked only by relevance to user query, then search accuracy is improved, but content manipulation capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesearch accuracyVSAvoidcontent manipulation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the content presentation process into multiple independent components: (1) relevance-based ranking module that maintains search accuracy, (2) characteristic identification module that analyzes result set properties, (3) rule evaluation module that applies business rules, and (4) content manipulation module that executes actions. This segmentation allows each component to perform its function independently without compromising overall system performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the result set characteristics before final presentation. It identifies dominant characteristics, evaluates applicable rules, and determines content manipulation actions in advance, allowing the system to prepare personalized content presentations based on predicted user interests while maintaining the original search results integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If search engines promote particular brands in results, then business considerations are improved, but search neutrality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebusiness considerationsVSAvoidsearch neutrality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the system continuously monitors result set characteristics and adjusts content presentation based on identified patterns. When dominant characteristics are detected (e.g., a particular brand appearing frequently), the system applies appropriate business rules to promote relevant content while maintaining transparency about the manipulation applied, allowing users to understand why certain content is promoted.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes presentation parameters dynamically based on result set characteristics rather than permanently altering search neutrality. It adjusts content promotion levels, positioning, and visibility as variables that can be modified based on the specific query and result set properties, maintaining flexibility while preserving the core search functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If search engines expand content scope beyond query, then user interest inference is improved, but query relevance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interest inferenceVSAvoidquery relevance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by adding personalized content in specific locations within the search results page rather than uniformly modifying all results. It inserts complementary content, related items, or promotional material in strategically positioned areas where they enhance user interest without displacing or diluting the core query-relevant results, maintaining local relevance while adding value.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS7996375B2Result-based triggering for presentation of online content
Publication Date: 2011.08.09 ADOBE SYST ISRAEL
  • US7996375B2 patent drawing
  • US7996375B2 patent drawing
  • US7996375B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for delivering content is provided, including specifying a rule having a trigger and defining a content presentation action, and receiving a search query from a user. The method further includes generating a result set in response to the search query, identifying at least one characteristic of the result set, and comparing the at least one characteristic to the trigger. If the at least one characteristic satisfies the trigger, the content is presented as specified by the content presentation action that is defined by the rule. Other embodiments are also described.