Retail AI Reply Tracking for Customer Behavior Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Generative AI systems in retail environments often provide inaccurate responses to customer inquiries or fail to recognize behaviors that result from the provided information, lacking the ability to determine if the generated text has caused a behavior change in customers.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus and program that utilizes a generative AI to generate responses to customer requests, tracks customer behavior, and records the correlation between responses and behaviors, enabling analysis of the response's effectiveness in influencing customer actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If generative AI is used to answer customer inquiries, then response generation capability is improved, but accuracy of responses deteriorates due to inability to answer questions not in training data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse generation capabilityVSAvoidaccuracy of responses
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where customer behavior data (purchases, product views, time spent) is collected and used to evaluate the effectiveness of AI-generated responses. This feedback loop allows the system to learn from actual customer actions and improve future response accuracy, addressing the limitation of static training data by continuously updating knowledge based on real-world outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary tracking of customer behavior patterns and preferences before finalizing response evaluation. By anticipating and monitoring customer actions in advance, the system can better predict which responses are likely to be effective and adjust its generation strategy proactively rather than reactively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Extent of automation

If generative AI generates text responses, then customer service automation is improved, but ability to determine effectiveness of generated text deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomer service automationVSAvoideffectiveness measurement capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically collects feedback data from customer behavior patterns (purchases made, products viewed, time spent on items) and uses this to measure the effectiveness of AI-generated responses. This automated feedback mechanism enables precise measurement of response effectiveness without requiring manual evaluation, maintaining high automation while improving measurement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces customer behavior data as an intermediary metric to indirectly measure response effectiveness. Instead of directly evaluating whether a response was 'effective,' the system uses observable behavioral intermediaries (purchases, views, engagement time) as proxies that objectively indicate response success, enabling precise measurement of automated responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If customer behavior tracking is implemented, then accuracy of response evaluation is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse evaluation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses existing store infrastructure (cameras, sensors, POS systems) for multiple purposes: customer identification, behavior tracking, and response evaluation. By making existing components multi-functional, the system achieves precise response evaluation without adding separate dedicated tracking hardware, thereby reducing overall system complexity while improving measurement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges customer behavior tracking functionality with existing store operational systems. Instead of creating a separate complex tracking system, the patent integrates behavior monitoring into existing point-of-sale data collection, camera systems, and customer relationship management platforms, combining multiple functions into unified systems that reduce overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20260024119A1Store system with automated customer reply and customer behavior tracking
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 TOSHIBA TEC KK
  • US20260024119A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024119A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024119A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment, an information processing apparatus for a store system includes a communication interface connected to a network, a storage unit, and a processor. The processor receives, via the communication interface, a customer request from a customer in a store, then generate a reply text in response to the customer request. The reply text is generated using a generative AI based on a prompt corresponding to the customer request. The processor then supplies a customer response to the customer based on the generated reply text, and then receives customer behavior information and tracks a behavior of the customer in the store after the customer response has been supplied. The processor records, in the storage unit, the customer behavior information representing the tracked behavior of the customer in correlation with the customer response supplied to the customer.