Retail Checkout Sensing With Confidence-Based Virtual Carts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional physical stores require manual checkout processes for customers to purchase items, which can be time-consuming and prone to errors or fraud, and existing automated checkout systems lack real-time confidence in item selection and tracking.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing facility sensors and mobile apparatuses to track user and item locations, enabling automated checkout by associating item identifiers with user accounts and processing transactions without manual intervention, while providing real-time cart content tracking and confidence scoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual checkout processes are used in traditional physical stores, then customers can purchase items with human assistance and verification, but the process becomes time-consuming and prone to errors or fraud

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of item selection and transaction processingVSAvoidcheckout processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated checkout where customers serve themselves by picking items and exiting without manual cashier intervention. Sensors automatically detect items taken, track them in a virtual cart, and process payments without human assistance, eliminating checkout wait times while maintaining reliability through multiple verification mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical checkout processes with an automated sensor-based system. Cameras, weight sensors, and RFID readers detect and track items, while computer vision algorithms and confidence scoring systems process transactions electronically, substituting human cashier operations with automated technological systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated checkout systems are implemented to reduce manual intervention, then checkout speed increases, but real-time confidence in item selection and tracking becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecheckout processing speedVSAvoidconfidence in item selection detection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors item selection events and updates confidence scores in real-time based on sensor data from multiple sources. This feedback mechanism allows the system to maintain high confidence in automated detection by constantly verifying item locations, cart contents, and customer actions across different sensor inputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs multiple sensor types (cameras, weight sensors, RFID readers) that serve multiple functions: detecting item pickup, tracking item location, verifying cart contents, and preventing fraud. This multi-functional approach enhances measurement precision by cross-validating data from different sensor sources simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If sensors and mobile apparatuses are deployed throughout the facility to track users and items, then automated checkout accuracy improves, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated item tracking accuracyVSAvoidnumber of sensors and tracking components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each sensor and mobile apparatus is designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously. Cameras detect item pickup, track customer movement, and verify checkout completion. Weight sensors monitor cart weight changes to detect item addition/removal. This multi-functionality reduces the total number of components needed while maintaining high tracking accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple sensing capabilities into integrated mobile apparatuses and fixed sensor systems. Rather than deploying separate devices for each function, the system merges camera, RFID, and weight sensing capabilities into unified tracking infrastructure that serves multiple purposes across the facility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Object-generated harmful factors

If real-time cart content tracking is implemented with confidence scoring, then fraud and shrink are reduced, but data processing requirements and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshrink and fraudVSAvoidcomputational energy for real-time processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system processes data at different levels of detail based on confidence thresholds. For high-confidence events, minimal processing is required. For lower-confidence situations, the system applies more intensive verification only when necessary, rather than uniformly processing all data at maximum detail, thus reducing overall computational energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-processes and validates sensor data as it is collected, performing initial confidence assessments and filtering before full transaction processing. This preliminary action reduces the computational load on downstream systems by eliminating obviously valid or invalid events before they require intensive processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12567101B1Systems and method for customized retail environments
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12567101B1 patent drawing
  • US12567101B1 patent drawing
  • US12567101B1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure describes, in part, systems for enabling facilities to implement techniques to determine when users are in possession of items when located within and/or exiting the facilities. For instance, a system may use one or more sensors of a facility and of a mobile apparatus to determine interactions with items in a facility. The system may determine confidence scores for the interactions and may direct the user to varying checkout experiences based on the confidence scores associated with virtual carts of their items and may enable additional user experiences and interactions with the facility and items of the facility to improve customer experiences.