Centralized Adjudication System for Retail Clinic Claims
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Retail clinics face inefficiencies in determining patient medical treatment coverage, eligibility, and copayment amounts due to lack of real-time access to insurer data, leading to inaccurate determinations and cumbersome manual processes.
Innovation Solution
A system where retail clinics electronically transmit patient and treatment information to a centralized adjudication facility for instant determination of coverage, eligibility, and copayment amounts, enabling swift and accurate billing through the NCPDP network or internet-enabled web interface, and allowing for electronic payment processing.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Ease of operation
If manual review of plan summary sheets and telephone calls are used to determine patient coverage, then the process can be completed without real-time electronic access, but the determination accuracy and speed deteriorate
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces a centralized adjudication facility as an intermediary between the retail clinic and the insurer. This facility receives patient and treatment information electronically, determines coverage, eligibility, and copayment amounts, then returns the results to the retail clinic. This intermediary system resolves the contradiction by providing both real-time electronic access (improving speed and accuracy) while maintaining operational simplicity for the clinician.
2Device complexity
If manual review processes are used to determine patient coverage and eligibility, then no real-time electronic system is required, but the processing time and workload increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of reviewing plan summary sheets and making telephone calls with an electronic automated system. The centralized adjudication facility electronically receives patient information, automatically determines coverage and eligibility, and instantly returns results to the retail clinic. This substitution dramatically improves processing speed while the automated nature of the system keeps operational complexity low for the end user.
3Reliability
If clinicians manually research and record full transaction details, then accurate records can be maintained, but the time required exceeds available working hours
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by having the centralized adjudication facility determine coverage, eligibility, and copayment amounts before the clinician needs to process the patient. The system proactively researches and retrieves all necessary insurance information in advance, then presents the results to the clinician ready for recording. This eliminates the time-consuming post-patient research phase while ensuring accurate records are created from pre-verified data.
4Adaptability or versatility
If multiple post-it notes are left for next clinician to reconcile, then transaction tracking is attempted, but the process becomes cumbersome and error-prone
Solution Approach 1:
The patent uses electronic copying and data transmission instead of physical post-it notes. The centralized adjudication facility electronically transmits patient information, coverage determinations, and transaction details directly to the retail clinic's computer system. This electronic copy system maintains complete transaction tracking capability while eliminating the physical clutter and errors associated with manual note-passing between clinicians.
Data Source
AI summary
A method for electronically determining patient medical treatment eligibility, coverage, copayment amount and insurer billing simultaneously, by: (a) a patient requesting medical treatment at a retail clinic; (b) the patient presenting a health insurance card at the retail clinic; (c) the retail clinic transmitting patient health insurance card information to a centralized adjudication facility; (d) the retail clinic transmitting medical treatment information to the centralized adjudication facility; (e) the centralized adjudication facility determining patient medical treatment coverage, eligibility and copayment amount (f) transmitting the patient medical treatment coverage, eligibility and copayment amount from the centralized adjudication facility to the retail clinic; (g) the patient purchasing the medical treatment by paying the retail clinic the copayment amount, (h) transmitting a bill to the health care insurance provider; and (i) thereby informing the retail clinic clinician to sell the medical treatment to the patient.