False Alarm Reduction in Retail Event Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems face challenges in detecting fraudulent barcode scans and false alarms in retail environments, leading to inefficiencies in identifying theft and resource wastage due to high false alarm rates.

Innovation Solution

A system that analyzes video records and transaction data using a support vector machine classifier to differentiate between actual and fake barcode scans by measuring temporal differences and applying heuristic rules, reducing false alarms through a ranking and scoring process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If computerized tools are used to filter and mine video data to detect theft behavior, then detection capability is improved, but false alarm rate increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetheft detection capabilityVSAvoidfalse alarm rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple data sources (video data, transaction data, sensor data) and multiple analysis methods (computer vision algorithms, pattern recognition, statistical analysis) into an integrated detection system. This merging allows the system to cross-validate findings across different data types, reducing false alarms while maintaining high detection capability for actual theft behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts detection parameters and thresholds based on contextual information from multiple sources. By changing parameters adaptively rather than using fixed thresholds, the system can distinguish between genuine theft patterns and benign behaviors that might otherwise trigger false alarms, thereby improving both detection reliability and reducing measurement precision errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If manual review of video records is performed to verify suspected theft, then detection accuracy is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary automated analysis of video data, transaction data, and sensor data to pre-identify and prioritize suspicious patterns before manual review. By conducting preliminary filtering and scoring of potential theft incidents, the system prepares data in advance so that manual reviewers can focus only on high-probability cases, thereby maintaining high detection accuracy while significantly reducing the time required for manual verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary automated analysis layer between video capture and manual review. This intermediary system processes video records, transaction data, and sensor information to generate prioritized lists of suspicious activities, acting as a mediator that filters and prepares data for efficient manual review. This intermediary processing maintains detection accuracy while reducing the time burden on manual reviewers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If sophisticated video analysis algorithms are applied to detect abnormal behavior, then detection capability is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetheft detection capabilityVSAvoidalgorithm complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex detection task into multiple independent analysis modules that process different data types (video analysis, transaction pattern analysis, sensor data analysis) separately. Each module applies specialized algorithms appropriate to its data type, and results are then integrated. This segmentation reduces overall computational complexity by breaking down sophisticated analysis into manageable, specialized components rather than requiring one complex monolithic algorithm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs a universal data processing framework that handles multiple data types (video, transaction records, sensor data) through common analysis pipelines and integration mechanisms. This multi-functional approach allows the same computational infrastructure to process diverse data sources, reducing device complexity compared to having separate specialized systems for each data type while maintaining high detection capability across all modalities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10242267B2Systems and methods for false alarm reduction during event detection
Publication Date: 2019.03.26 KYNDRYL INC
  • US10242267B2 patent drawing
  • US10242267B2 patent drawing
  • US10242267B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present invention provide a system, method, and program product to determine whether a product has been successfully purchased by identifying in a video record when a movement of a product adjacent to a scanner occurs, and whether the scanner did not record a purchase transaction at that time; measuring a difference in time between the time of the movement of the product and a time of another movement of a product, and determining by a trained support vector machine a likelihood that the product was successfully purchased. Alternately, the difference in time can be measured between the time of the movement of the product and a time of a transaction record, or between the time of the movement of the product and a boundary time. The support vector machine can use a radial basis function kernel and can generate a decision value and a confidence score.