Automated Markdown Optimization for Retail Pricing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Retailers face challenges in manually determining the optimal time and amount for product markdowns, leading to inefficiencies and increased costs, as well as difficulties in selecting the right items and stores for markdowns.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize historical product data and market inputs to identify products for markdown, generate optimal markdown timing and values, and prioritize markdowns based on these calculations, while also considering user-specific constraints and inventory management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual review and determination of markdown parameters is performed, then flexibility and control over markdown decisions are maintained, but operational burden increases and markdown costs rise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarkdown decision-making processVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through automated markdown parameter determination. The markdown optimization module automatically analyzes product data, demand forecasts, and inventory levels to generate optimal markdown recommendations without requiring manual review, thereby reducing operational burden while maintaining control through configurable parameters and approval workflows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical manual review process with an automated computational system. The system uses algorithms to process product data, calculate optimal markdown parameters, and generate recommendations, substituting human manual analysis with automated computational methods to improve efficiency while maintaining decision quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If manual markdown determination is performed, then control over markdown timing and percentage is maintained, but markdown costs increase and sales are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarkdown controlVSAvoidmarkdown cost and lost sales
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where markdown performance data is continuously collected and analyzed. The markdown optimization module uses this feedback to refine future markdown recommendations, learning from actual outcomes to improve timing and percentage decisions, thereby reducing lost sales and optimizing markdown costs while maintaining control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis and optimization before markdown execution. By pre-calculating optimal markdown parameters based on forecasted demand and inventory projections, the system determines the best timing and percentage in advance, preventing suboptimal markdown decisions that would result in lost sales or excessive costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If automated markdown optimization is implemented, then operational efficiency and revenue optimization improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarkdown process efficiencyVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by creating a multi-functional markdown optimization platform that handles product identification, parameter optimization, timing determination, and performance tracking within a single integrated system. This consolidates multiple functions into one coherent architecture, improving efficiency without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the markdown optimization system into distinct modular components: product identification module, optimization parameter determination module, timing module, and execution module. This modular architecture manages complexity by organizing functions into separate, manageable segments that can be independently developed and maintained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250131344A1System and method for controlling product price adjustments
Publication Date: 2025.04.24 WALMART APOLLO LLC
  • US20250131344A1 patent drawing
  • US20250131344A1 patent drawing
  • US20250131344A1 patent drawing

AI summary

System and methods for controlling product price adjustments are disclosed. In some embodiments, a disclosed method includes: identifying, based on the historical product data, one of more products from the plurality of products for implementation of a markdown, receiving, from a user interface, a plurality of market inputs associated with the one or more products, generating an optimal time period and optimal markdown value associated with the markdown of the one or more products, and mapping the one or products to a prioritization indication based on the optimal time period and the optimal markdown value.