Retail Server Automating Product Regulation Eligibility Checks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current product regulation systems, such as the WIC program, face inefficiencies due to manual processes, strict rule adherence, and lack of nutritional equivalence assessments, leading to slow eligibility determinations and insufficient feedback for manufacturers.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for a retail server to automate product regulation eligibility checks by comparing product data against regulation criteria, identifying similar products, and requesting determinations from product regulation authorities, while allowing for reformulation to meet eligibility standards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual processes are used for product regulation eligibility determination, then regulatory accuracy is maintained, but processing time and operational efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical review processes with an automated computer-based system that uses algorithms to compare product data against regulation criteria. The system automatically determines eligibility by processing product information through computational logic, eliminating the need for manual reviewer intervention while maintaining regulatory accuracy through systematic rule-based evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables products to self-evaluate their eligibility by automatically comparing their own data characteristics against stored regulation criteria. The product data is processed through the system which performs the eligibility determination without requiring external manual analysis, allowing the system to serve itself in the evaluation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If strict rule adherence is enforced without nutritional equivalence assessment, then regulatory compliance is ensured, but product eligibility determination becomes overly restrictive and loses fairness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulatory complianceVSAvoideligibility flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system evaluates multiple product parameters and characteristics rather than relying on a single strict rule. By analyzing various data points about the product and comparing them against regulation criteria, the system can determine eligibility based on overall nutritional equivalence rather than requiring exact matches on every parameter, thus providing flexibility while maintaining compliance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback mechanisms that allow for iterative evaluation of product eligibility. By assessing whether products meet the spirit of the regulations through nutritional equivalence analysis rather than rigid rule matching, the system can adjust determinations to ensure fairness while maintaining regulatory intent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive product analysis is performed for each eligibility determination, then determination accuracy is improved, but system complexity and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetermination accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary organization and categorization of product data and regulation criteria before actual eligibility determinations. By pre-processing and structuring the data in advance, the system reduces the complexity of individual eligibility assessments while maintaining comprehensive analysis capabilities through efficiently organized information ready for quick comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system divides the eligibility determination process into separate modular components: data collection, criteria storage, comparison logic, and determination output. This segmentation allows each component to be independently optimized and managed, reducing overall system complexity while enabling comprehensive product analysis through coordinated modular operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10861070B2System and method for processing and implementing product regulations
Publication Date: 2020.12.08 MEIJER INC
  • US10861070B2 patent drawing
  • US10861070B2 patent drawing
  • US10861070B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a system and method for processing and implementing product regulations at a retail enterprise, a list is received by a retail server of products offered for sale by the enterprise that are regulation eligible, the received list of products is compared with product data identifying products offered for sale to all customers of the enterprise, each product in a database of the enterprise that matches a product in the list and that is not already marked therein as regulation eligible is marked as regulation eligible, and for each product so marked at least one characteristic of the product upon which regulation eligibility is based is determined, the database is searched to identify similar products that include the at least one characteristic, and for each identified similar product a request is transmitted for a determination of regulation eligibility thereof.