Retail Shrinkage Prediction Using Machine Learning and Sensor Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for preventing retail theft, or 'shrinkage,' are largely reactive and costly, failing to provide a proactive solution that effectively deters theft and improves the retail customer experience.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a sensor control system, two databases for shrinkage data, an analytics engine, and a machine learning engine that uses real-time sensor data, external data, and predictive modeling to identify high-risk situations, issuing alerts and adjusting sensor settings to proactively mitigate theft risks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional shrinkage deterrent techniques (cameras, security tags, asset protection personnel) are deployed, then some shrinkage activity is deterred, but the costs increase and the approach remains reactive rather than proactive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshrinkage prevention effectivenessVSAvoidsecurity system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by using machine learning models to predict shrinkage risk before theft occurs. Historical data, product characteristics, and contextual factors are analyzed in advance to generate risk scores, enabling proactive deployment of security resources to high-risk areas and times rather than reacting to incidents after they happen.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing the retail environment itself to generate and process the data needed for shrinkage prediction. Sensors, POS systems, and existing store infrastructure automatically collect and feed data into the predictive model, eliminating the need for separate manual monitoring systems and enabling the store to serve its own security needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If conventional shrinkage deterrent techniques are deployed, then some shrinkage activity is deterred, but the approach remains reactive rather than proactive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshrinkage prevention effectivenessVSAvoidresponse time to shrinkage incidents
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by using machine learning models to predict shrinkage risk before theft occurs. Historical data, product characteristics, and contextual factors are analyzed in advance to generate risk scores, enabling proactive deployment of security resources to high-risk areas and times rather than reacting to incidents after they happen.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where real-time sensor data, transaction information, and security events are fed back into the predictive model. This allows the system to dynamically adjust risk assessments and alert security personnel to emerging threats, reducing response time from hours or days to minutes or seconds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If conventional shrinkage deterrent techniques are deployed, then some shrinkage activity is deterred, but additional costs must be absorbed by the retailer

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshrinkage prevention effectivenessVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by focusing security resources only on high-risk products, locations, and time periods identified by the predictive model. Instead of uniformly deploying cameras and personnel throughout the store, the system concentrates monitoring efforts where they are most needed, reducing overall operational costs while maintaining or improving shrinkage prevention effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by dynamically adjusting security resource allocation based on predicted risk levels. Camera surveillance intensity, personnel positioning, and alert thresholds are modified in real-time according to the model's risk assessments, optimizing the balance between security effectiveness and operational cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10380855B2Systems and methods for predicting and identifying retail shrinkage activity
Publication Date: 2019.08.13 WALMART APOLLO LLC
  • US10380855B2 patent drawing
  • US10380855B2 patent drawing
  • US10380855B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A retail shrinkage activity prediction and identification system that includes: a sensor control system, a first shrinkage database, a second shrinkage database, an analytics engine, and a machine learning engine. The sensor control system is communicatively coupled with a plurality of sensors arranged in a retail environment. The sensor control system is configured to control a setting of each of the plurality of sensors. The first shrinkage database includes retail shrinkage data for at least the retail environment. The retail shrinkage data includes at least one item at high risk for shrinkage or at least one time at high risk for shrinkage activity. The second shrinkage database includes external data related to shrinkage in a geographic area of the retail environment. The analytics engine is communicatively coupled with the first shrinkage database, the second shrinkage database, and the sensor control system.