Retail Space Elasticity Modeling for Merchandising Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Retailers face challenges in optimizing store space allocation due to high product turnover and rapid obsolescence, making it difficult to analyze the impact of changes in product mix and display layout on sales and profitability using existing statistical methods.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that uses elasticity modeling to optimize display space allocation, involving a computer system with data updating, curve fitting, and synthetic data creation modules to generate space elasticity curves and synthetic item records, allowing for cross-category optimization of store space based on summarized point-of-sale data and user-defined goals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If traditional regression analysis is used to analyze product data, then analysis simplicity is maintained, but analysis accuracy deteriorates due to high product turnover and rapid obsolescence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis simplicityVSAvoidanalysis accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the product analysis by introducing a product lifecycle stage dimension, dividing products into different stages (introduction, growth, maturity, decline) based on their turnover characteristics. This segmentation allows the system to apply appropriate analysis methods to different product groups, improving accuracy while maintaining manageable complexity through structured categorization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic analysis by continuously updating product lifecycle stage classifications as products evolve over time. The system adapts to high turnover environments by dynamically reassigning products to different lifecycle stages based on current sales data and time elapsed, enabling accurate analysis despite rapid product obsolescence and introduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If detailed item-level data analysis is performed, then analysis precision is improved, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis precisionVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple data processing functions into an integrated system that simultaneously handles data collection, lifecycle stage classification, elasticity curve generation, and optimization recommendations. By combining these functions into a unified computational framework, the system achieves precise item-level analysis without proportionally increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses synthetic item records that replicate the essential characteristics of actual products based on elasticity curves and lifecycle stage patterns. These synthetic copies allow the system to perform detailed analysis on representative data structures without processing every individual transaction record, reducing data processing complexity while maintaining analysis precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If space allocation is optimized for maximum sales, then sales increase, but adaptability to product lifecycle changes decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesalesVSAvoidadaptability to product lifecycle changes
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic space allocation that automatically adjusts as products transition through lifecycle stages. The system continuously recalculates optimal space distribution based on current product stages, ensuring that space is allocated to products in growth and maturity stages while reducing space for products in decline, thereby maintaining both high sales and adaptability to changing product portfolios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback loops where sales performance data and product lifecycle stage updates continuously inform space allocation decisions. The system monitors actual sales outcomes and adjusts elasticity curves and space recommendations accordingly, enabling the system to adapt to product lifecycle changes while maintaining optimized sales performance through iterative improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8838469B2System and method for optimizing display space allocation of merchandising using regression analysis to generate space elasticity curves
Publication Date: 2014.09.16 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SERVICES LTD
  • US8838469B2 patent drawing
  • US8838469B2 patent drawing
  • US8838469B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system uses elasticity modeling to enable cross category optimization of store display space for merchandise for any group of stores and items using point-of-sale data. A space elasticity curve is periodically created for each combination of performance metric, store cluster, planogram, and item segment, and is then scaled by individual store. A user can select any combination of stores and planograms, and the system then reconstructs the elasticity curves as individual “synthetic items,” which are averaged across the selected stores by creating average synthetic SKU records that reflect the estimated average store performance in each performance metric. The synthetic items are then used to either evaluate macro space performance across or within store areas, or to determine the best use of overall store display space available to permit management to optimally allocate display space for merchandise.