Retailer-Specific Checksums for RFID Tag Ownership Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In retail environments with shared walls, RFID tags from neighboring stores can be unintentionally scanned, leading to incorrect inventory reporting due to the use of the same numbering schemes, especially in closed supply chains where retailers do not want to pay for globally registered GS1 numbers, resulting in data pollution and inaccuracies.

Innovation Solution

Implementing retailer-specific secure checksums on RFID tags using a unique retailer number, which is calculated and loaded onto the tag, allowing for differentiation and validation of ownership by regenerating the checksum during scanning, thereby creating a virtual wall between neighboring retailers' inventory systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the same numbering scheme is used across neighboring retailers, then RFID tags can be universally scanned and read, but data pollution and inventory inaccuracies occur due to unintentional scanning of neighboring stores' tags

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRFID tag scanning capabilityVSAvoidinventory data accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by embedding retailer-specific checksums in the EPC structure of RFID tags. Each retailer's tags contain a unique checksum derived from their identifier, allowing RFID readers to distinguish between tags from different retailers. This differentiates the local characteristic (retailer ownership) within the universal RFID scanning framework, enabling accurate identification of tag ownership while maintaining universal scanability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If physical shielding is implemented between neighboring stores, then inventory data accuracy is maintained, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory data accuracyVSAvoidphysical shielding infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/physical shielding system with an informational/digital solution. Instead of installing physical barriers to prevent RFID signal leakage, the system uses checksum validation embedded in the EPC data structure. The RFID reader calculates the checksum from the EPC and compares it with the expected retailer-specific checksum, thereby achieving accurate tag identification through data processing rather than physical separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Area of stationary object

If standardized GS1 numbering schemes are used, then global inventory tracking is enabled, but retailers incur additional costs and lose autonomy over their numbering systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveglobal inventory tracking coverageVSAvoidretailer-specific control over numbering
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the EPC structure into distinct components: a standardized portion that enables global recognition and a retailer-specific checksum portion that provides local identification. The EPC is divided such that the checksum is derived from the retailer's identifier combined with product information, allowing each retailer to maintain autonomy over their numbering scheme while still being compatible with universal RFID scanning infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11475747B2Electronic product code (EPC) encoding for retailer-specific radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags
Publication Date: 2022.10.18 SENSORMATIC ELECTRONICS CORP
  • US11475747B2 patent drawing
  • US11475747B2 patent drawing
  • US11475747B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system determines an electronic product code (EPC) and a checksum read from a radio-frequency identification (RFID) tag. The system calculates a new checksum based on the EPC and a retailer-specific number associated with a retailer that owns one or more RFID tags. The system compares the new checksum with the checksum read from the RFID tag, and determines whether the RFID tag is owned by the retailer based on whether the new checksum matches the checksum read from the RFID tag.