Memory Cell Reload Circuit for High-Energy Particle Collisions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current memory devices in aerospace and high-altitude applications are vulnerable to high-energy particle collisions, leading to undesirable state changes in memory cells, which existing solutions like Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR) systems are costly and complex to implement, especially when RF functions are involved.

Innovation Solution

A memory device with retention, detection, and management means to automatically correct high-energy particle-induced state changes, using a D flip-flop memory cell, RC circuit for retention, Schmitt trigger for signal smoothing, and multiplexers for management, allowing for autonomous data reloading without the need for a clock signal that disrupts RF functions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If Triple Modular Redundancy (TMR) systems are used to correct high-energy particle effects, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to high-energy particle collisionsVSAvoidcomplexity of TMR with voting system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential function of TMR (detecting and correcting particle-induced errors) and implements it through a simplified architecture using a single memory cell with retention means, detection means, and management means, eliminating the need for three redundant cells and voting logic while maintaining error correction capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The memory device is segmented into distinct functional blocks: retention means (for storing a copy of the data), detection means (for comparing current and retained values), and management means (for controlling reload operations). This modular segmentation simplifies the overall system while achieving TMR-like reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If TMR systems with voting elements are implemented, then reliability is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to high-energy particle collisionsVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a single memory cell instead of three redundant cells, significantly reducing the amount of hardware required. The retention means stores a temporary copy that can be discarded after correction, eliminating the need for permanent redundant structures and reducing manufacturing costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If clock signals are used for refreshing data in TMR systems, then reliability is improved, but RF functions are disrupted due to spectral pollution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrection of SEU effectsVSAvoidspectral pollution from clock signal
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the clock signal from the memory correction system by using asynchronous detection and management means that operate independently of periodic refreshing, thereby eliminating spectral pollution that would interfere with RF functions while maintaining the ability to detect and correct SEU errors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Device complexity

If a single memory cell is used instead of TMR, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability against high-energy particles deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of single memory cellVSAvoidresistance to single event upsets
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The retention means performs preliminary action by storing a copy of the data before a potential SEU event can affect the memory cell. This pre-stored copy enables subsequent comparison and correction, providing reliability protection while using only a single memory cell

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The detection means continuously compares the current memory cell value with the retained value and provides feedback to the management means. This feedback mechanism enables automatic detection and correction of SEU errors, compensating for the absence of redundant memory cells and maintaining high reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8971136B2Memory device correcting the effect of collision of high-energy particles
Publication Date: 2015.03.03 THALES SA
  • US8971136B2 patent drawing
  • US8971136B2 patent drawing
  • US8971136B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A memory device automatically correcting the effect of collisions of high-energy particles, comprising at least one memory cell, and further comprising: retention means for retaining, for a determined period, a single copy of the stored value stored in said memory cell; detection means for detecting a change of state of said memory cell, by comparing the stored value stored in said memory cell with the value in retention in said retention means; and management means suitable for determining whether a detected change of state of said memory cell is due to a high-energy particle and, in which case, to automatically command a reloading of the stored value stored in said retention means into said memory cell.