Retaining Catch Bending Portion Absorbs Pipe Forces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing socket pipe connections face issues with retaining catches breaking due to severe bending forces caused by manufacturing fluctuations in pipes, particularly in ductile cast iron pipes used in high-pressure water and waste water systems, leading to potential failure under tensile forces.

Innovation Solution

The retaining catch features a bending portion with a reduced cross-section, allowing it to bend like a film hinge and absorb bending forces, and is made from pressure-resistant plastic materials like glass fiber-reinforced plastics, which are more cost-effective and less prone to creep, with a projection for proper alignment and a continuous arcuate transition for increased strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If retaining catches are made from rigid materials to withstand high tensile forces, then strength is improved, but susceptibility to breakage under bending forces increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidresistance to breakage
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The retaining catch is segmented into two distinct portions: a rigid catch body for withstanding tensile forces and a flexible bending portion for absorbing bending forces. This segmentation allows each portion to be optimized for its specific function, preventing breakage while maintaining strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the retaining catch have different mechanical properties: the catch body is made rigid for strength, while the bending portion is made flexible for shock absorption. This local differentiation of material properties resolves the contradiction between needing rigidity for strength and flexibility for reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If retaining catches are designed with uniform cross-section for strength, then load-bearing capacity is improved, but adaptability to manufacturing tolerances worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-bearing capacityVSAvoidtolerance to manufacturing fluctuations
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The bending portion is designed to be dynamically flexible, allowing it to deform and adapt to manufacturing tolerances and misalignments. This dynamic flexibility compensates for variations in pipe dimensions while the rigid catch body maintains load-bearing capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The cross-sectional parameters of the retaining catch are changed along its length: the catch body has a larger cross-section for strength, while the bending portion has a reduced cross-section for flexibility. This parameter variation allows the structure to adapt to manufacturing tolerances while maintaining strength where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If retaining catches use metal materials for strength, then mechanical strength is improved, but electrical conductivity increases causing unwanted creeping currents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical strengthVSAvoidelectrical conductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The retaining catch uses a non-metallic plastic material that is sufficient for the application's mechanical strength requirements. This disposable-like approach (using adequate rather than maximum material properties) eliminates the harmful electrical conductivity while providing sufficient strength for the retaining function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The retaining catch is made from a composite plastic material that provides sufficient mechanical strength without the electrical conductivity of metals. This material selection resolves the contradiction by eliminating the harmful electrical property while maintaining the necessary mechanical properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances the robustness of retaining catches, preventing breakage under manufacturing tolerances and high pressures, ensuring secure connections in pipe systems while maintaining electrical insulation and reducing material costs.

Implementation Method 1

the catch body along the bending portion has a reduction cross-section which is reduced in size—viewed in the radial direction—in relation to the catch cross-section

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10359136B2Retaining catch for a socket pipe connection
Publication Date: 2019.07.23 DUKTUS PRODN GMBH
  • US10359136B2 patent drawing
  • US10359136B2 patent drawing
  • US10359136B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A retaining catch for a socket pipe connection has a substantially circle-arc-shaped catch body, on which is arranged a protrusion which projects from the catch body. The catch body has a catch cross section in a cross-sectional plane as seen radially in a direction transverse to its circle-arc shaped longitudinal extent. The catch body has a bending portion, and the catch body, along the bending portion, has a reduction cross section which is reduced in size—as seen radially—in relation to the catch cross section.