Retaining Wave Spring Integrating Shock Absorption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing applications require separate components for retaining functions and shock absorption, leading to increased component count and manufacturing costs.

Innovation Solution

A retaining wave spring that combines a first open-loop with a substantially planar wall and a second open-loop with curved portions, providing both retaining and spring functions in a single component.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If separate retaining ring and wave spring components are used, then each component can perform its specific function effectively, but the component count increases and manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional performanceVSAvoidcomponent count
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the retaining ring and wave spring into a single integrated component called a 'retaining wave spring.' This unified component combines the retaining function (providing a retaining wall) with the spring function (absorbing shock and maintaining force), thereby reducing component count while maintaining the functional performance of both separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The retaining wave spring is designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously: it provides retaining functionality through its retaining wall structure and spring functionality through its wave-shaped configuration. This multi-functional design eliminates the need for separate retaining ring and wave spring components, reducing assembly complexity and manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If a retaining ring is used alone, then the structure is simple, but it cannot absorb shock or maintain constant force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidshock absorption capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The retaining wave spring combines the simple retaining ring structure with wave spring characteristics, integrating both retaining and shock absorption functions into a single component. This merger maintains structural simplicity while adding the necessary shock absorption capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The retaining wave spring is designed to perform multiple functions: providing a retaining wall for mechanical retention and simultaneously absorbing shock through its wave-shaped structure. This multi-functionality ensures that a single component can replace both a retaining ring and a wave spring, maintaining simplicity while enhancing performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If a wave spring is used alone, then shock absorption is provided, but it lacks the retaining wall function

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshock absorptionVSAvoidfunctional completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The retaining wave spring merges the wave spring's shock absorption capability with the retaining ring's wall function into a single integrated component. This combination ensures that the component provides both shock absorption and retaining functionality, making it functionally complete.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The retaining wave spring is designed to simultaneously provide shock absorption through its wave-shaped structure and retaining functionality through its retaining wall. This multi-functional design ensures that a single component can replace both a wave spring and a retaining ring, achieving functional completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If two separate components (retaining ring and wave spring) are manufactured, then each can be optimized independently, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent optimizationVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the retaining ring and wave spring into a single retaining wave spring component, reducing the number of manufacturing operations, material handling steps, and assembly processes. This integration lowers manufacturing cost while maintaining the optimized functional characteristics of both original components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The retaining wave spring is designed as a multi-functional component that combines retaining and spring functions, allowing for a single manufacturing process instead of producing two separate components. This reduces manufacturing complexity and cost while maintaining the optimized performance of both functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Reduces component count and manufacturing costs by integrating the functions of a retaining ring and a wave spring, maintaining a constant force and minimizing shock effects.

Implementation Method 1

The second open-loop has a wall having curved portions... maintaining a force between components... absorbing shock

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9429179B2Retaining wave spring
Publication Date: 2016.08.30 EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LTD
  • US9429179B2 patent drawing
  • US9429179B2 patent drawing
  • US9429179B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A retaining wave spring includes a first open-loop that has a wall that is substantially planar. The retaining wave spring also includes a second open-loop continuing from an end portion of the first open-loop. The second open-loop has a wall having curved portions. An outer diameter of the first open-loop and an outer diameter of the second open-loop have different sizes.