Reticle End Effector Lateral Force Fixation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current reticle handling methods in the semiconductor industry, which rely on passive counter-gravity techniques using friction and suction, are inadequate for achieving high accelerations and throughput due to limited grip force and control over reticle movement.

Innovation Solution

An end effector with at least two arms and supports configured to apply lateral or downward forces to fixate a reticle, allowing for upward force application, enabling higher accelerations and throughput by securely gripping the reticle with multiple fingers and pushers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If passive counter-gravity techniques using friction and suction are used to handle reticles, then the handling method is simple, but the grip force is limited and cannot achieve high accelerations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrip forceVSAvoidhandling method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The end effector employs dynamic actuation of multiple supports (fingers) that can independently adjust their position and applied force. The gripper transitions from a static passive hold to a dynamic active grip where fingers can be actuated to apply lateral forces, enabling high acceleration handling while maintaining controlled complexity through programmable motion sequences

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The reticle handling system is segmented into multiple independent supports (at least two fingers) attached to separate arms. Each support can be independently actuated and controlled, allowing distributed grip force application across different locations on the reticle. This segmentation enables sophisticated force control without requiring a monolithic complex mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If passive friction-based gripping is used, then the device structure is simple, but throughput is limited due to insufficient grip force for high acceleration

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidgrip force
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The end effector employs dynamic actuation of multiple supports (fingers) that can independently adjust their position and applied force. The gripper transitions from a static passive hold to a dynamic active grip where fingers can be actuated to apply lateral forces, enabling high acceleration handling while maintaining controlled complexity through programmable motion sequences

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines multiple passive support elements into an active multi-finger gripper that integrates both passive structural support and active actuation mechanisms. By merging the simple passive finger structure with controlled actuation, the system achieves high grip forces necessary for high-speed reticle transfer while maintaining the simplicity of the basic support concept

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of operation

If lateral or downward forces are applied to fixate the reticle, then control during handling is improved, but the mechanism becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol during handlingVSAvoidend effector mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The end effector employs dynamic actuation of multiple supports (fingers) that can independently adjust their position and applied force. The gripper transitions from a static passive hold to a dynamic active grip where fingers can be actuated to apply lateral forces, enabling high acceleration handling while maintaining controlled complexity through programmable motion sequences

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-finger end effector structure serves multiple functions: it provides passive gravitational counterbalance, active lateral fixation through finger actuation, and distributed force application. This multi-functionality achieves superior control capability without proportionally increasing complexity, as the same basic finger structure accomplishes multiple handling objectives

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a firm grip, allowing for higher acceleration and throughput in reticle handling, preventing slipping and improving control, while relying on existing movement axes and mechanisms without additional activation, thus enhancing reticle transfer efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

Current reticle handling methods in the semiconductor industry, which rely on passive counter-gravity techniques using friction and suction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

end effector is configured to handle a reticle by applying at least a lateral force or a downward force on a reticle during handling to fixate the reticle to at least two supports which are configured to apply an upwards force on the reticle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS9618857B2End effectors and reticle handling at a high throughput
Publication Date: 2017.04.11 KLA CORP
  • US9618857B2 patent drawing
  • US9618857B2 patent drawing
  • US9618857B2 patent drawing

AI summary

End effectors of reticle mechanical interface pods as well as reticle handling methods are provided, which handle the reticle by the end effector by applying a lateral force and/or a downward force on the reticle during the handling to fixate the reticle to at least two supports (e.g., at least four fingers) which are attached to at least two arms of the end effector and are configured to apply an upwards force on the reticle. Hence the reticle is fixated to the end effector and can be handled with higher accelerations and at a higher throughput than current methods. End effectors may have multiple fingers to fixate the reticle, and on more pushers may apply a downwards force to further fixate the reticle to the supports.