Reticle Inspection Sparseness-Weighted Intensity Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Semiconductor reticle inspection systems face challenges in detecting defects and variations in critical dimension (CD) uniformity, especially in sparse pattern regions where feature edges contribute less to the signal, leading to difficulty in detecting CD changes and noise interference.

Innovation Solution

The method involves obtaining patch area images of reticles, determining integrated intensity values, applying a gain based on pattern sparseness metrics, and generating a difference intensity map to correlate feature characteristic variations. A calibration factor is used to convert the difference intensity map into a critical dimension (CD) map, accounting for known CD values from a design database, and adjusting intensity values in flat field areas to minimize noise from feature edges.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional reticle inspection methods are used, then inspection coverage is achieved, but measurement precision deteriorates in sparse pattern regions due to insufficient signal from feature edges

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCD uniformity measurement precisionVSAvoiddetection reliability in sparse regions
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the inspection parameter from direct intensity measurement to sparseness-weighted intensity measurement. By calculating a sparseness metric for each patch and using it to weight the intensity values, the system adapts the measurement parameters to account for pattern density variations, thereby maintaining measurement precision across both dense and sparse regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a sparseness metric as an intermediary parameter between the raw intensity data and the final CD uniformity measurement. This intermediary metric quantifies the pattern density in each patch and serves as a weighting factor, mediating the relationship between intensity signals and measurement results to compensate for insufficient edge signals in sparse regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If intensity values from all patches are used directly, then processing speed is maintained, but measurement precision deteriorates due to noise interference from flat field areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-noise ratioVSAvoidinspection processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by treating different patches differently based on their sparseness characteristics. Patches with low sparseness (likely containing flat field areas) receive different weighting or filtering treatment compared to patches with high sparseness, thereby locally optimizing the signal-to-noise ratio without requiring complete reprocessing of all data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If uniform inspection parameters are applied across all reticle regions, then device complexity is minimized, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to inability to account for pattern density variations

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCD uniformity across reticleVSAvoidinspection parameter complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic inspection parameters by calculating a sparseness metric for each patch and using it to dynamically adjust the weighting of intensity values. This dynamic approach allows the inspection system to adapt to local pattern density variations across the reticle, improving manufacturing precision without requiring complex manual configuration of different parameters for different regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9778205B2Delta die and delta database inspection
Publication Date: 2017.10.03 KLA CORP
  • US9778205B2 patent drawing
  • US9778205B2 patent drawing
  • US9778205B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are methods and apparatus for inspecting a photolithographic reticle. An inspection tool is used to obtain a plurality of patch area images of each patch area of each die of a set of identical dies on a reticle. An integrated intensity value for each patch area image is determined. A gain is applied to the integrated intensity value for each patch area image based on a pattern sparseness metric of such patch area image and its relative value to other patch area images' pattern sparseness metric. A difference between the integrated intensity value of each patch of pairs of the dies, which each pair includes a test die and a reference die, is determined to form a difference intensity map of the reticle. The difference intensity map correlates with a feature characteristic variation that depends on feature edges of the reticle.