Distinguishing Artifacts from Pathological Features in Retinal Images

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Differentiating pathological features from non-pathological features (artifacts) in digital images obtained from retinal cameras is challenging, leading to potential misdiagnosis due to the similarity between the two and the introduction of artifacts from bright illumination and physical elements on the lens.

Innovation Solution

A diagnostic platform is introduced that uses detection models to classify digital features as either artifacts or pathological features, employing machine learning algorithms to identify and distinguish between artifacts caused by improper illumination and those caused by physical elements adhered to the lens, allowing for remediation actions such as cleaning or image filtering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Illumination intensity

If bright illumination is used to capture retinal images, then image brightness and visibility are improved, but artifacts are generated that can be mistaken for pathological features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage brightnessVSAvoidillumination artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Illumination intensityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of image features using machine learning models before final diagnosis, identifying and flagging illumination artifacts in advance to prevent misinterpretation as pathological features

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

A machine learning-based classification system acts as an intermediary between image capture and diagnosis, analyzing features to distinguish between genuine pathological indicators and illumination-induced artifacts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If physical elements adhere to the lens, then the lens structure remains simple, but artifacts are introduced that compromise diagnostic accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelens structureVSAvoidlens artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection and classification of lens artifacts using machine learning models, identifying them before they affect diagnostic interpretation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An automated classification system serves as an intermediary layer between image capture and diagnosis, detecting lens artifacts and preventing their misinterpretation as pathological features

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If manual inspection of image features is performed, then diagnostic thoroughness is improved, but differentiation between artifacts and pathological features becomes more time-consuming and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service through automated machine learning classification that independently identifies and categorizes image features, reducing reliance on time-consuming manual inspection while maintaining diagnostic accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual inspection is replaced with automated machine learning-based classification systems that process and differentiate image features more efficiently and accurately than human reviewers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If automated detection models are used to classify features, then differentiation speed is improved, but the complexity of the diagnostic system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature classification speedVSAvoiddiagnostic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The diagnostic system is segmented into distinct functional modules: image capture, machine learning-based feature detection, artifact classification, and diagnostic interpretation, allowing each component to be optimized independently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning classification system serves multiple functions simultaneously: detecting artifacts, identifying pathological features, and providing diagnostic support, reducing the need for separate specialized systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11875480B1Distinguishing artifacts from pathological features in digital images
Publication Date: 2024.01.16 VERILY HEALTH INC
  • US11875480B1 patent drawing
  • US11875480B1 patent drawing
  • US11875480B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Introduced here are approaches to assessing whether digital features (or simply “features”) detected in digital images by detection models are representative of artifacts that can obscure actual pathologies. A diagnostic platform may characterize each digital feature detected in a digital image based on its likelihood of being an artifact. For instance, a digital feature could be characterized as being representative of an artifact caused by improper illumination, an artifact caused by a physical element that is adhered to the lens through which light is collected by an imaging device, or a pathological feature indicative of a disease.