Retinal Blink Rejection Using Filtered SLO Image Correlation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for detecting eye blinks during retinal imaging are ineffective due to low information content and similar intensity characteristics between blink and non-blink conditions, particularly in peripheral scans, leading to unclear images and compromised scan quality.

Innovation Solution

A method involving spatial directional filtering and object filtering of IR SLO images, followed by cross-correlation to distinguish between blink and non-blink conditions, allowing for the removal of unclear images and improved retinal tracking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional blink detection methods are used, then the detection process is simple, but the detection accuracy is low due to similar intensity characteristics between blink and non-blink conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblink detection accuracyVSAvoidimage processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The image processing is divided into multiple stages: spatial directional filtering to enhance edges, object filtering to identify and remove non-retinal objects, and cross-correlation to compare processed images. This segmentation allows each stage to focus on specific features, improving blink detection accuracy while managing complexity through modular processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediate processed images as mediators between the raw images and the final blink detection result. The spatially filtered images and object-filtered images serve as intermediate representations that highlight relevant features and remove distractions, enabling more accurate cross-correlation-based blink detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If all captured images are included in the final frame stack, then the image acquisition is complete, but the final image quality is reduced due to inclusion of unclear images from blink conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefinal image qualityVSAvoidimage acquisition efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing of images during acquisition, applying spatial filtering and object filtering to identify unclear images before they are included in the final frame stack. This preliminary action allows the system to pre-screen images for quality, ensuring that only clear images are used in the final reconstruction, thereby maintaining high reliability without sacrificing productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The cross-correlation process provides feedback about image quality by comparing each captured image with reference images. Images with low correlation scores are identified as unclear and excluded from the final frame stack, creating a feedback mechanism that automatically quality-controls the acquired images and maintains high final image reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If retina tracking is performed without blink detection, then the tracking system is simpler, but the scan position accuracy is compromised due to loss of correct position during blinks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescan position accuracyVSAvoidtracking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tracking system is segmented into independent components: image acquisition, spatial filtering, object filtering, cross-correlation for position determination, and blink detection. This segmentation allows the system to accurately determine scan position only when clear images are available, maintaining high position accuracy while managing complexity through modular, condition-based processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary blink detection and exclusion of unclear images before retina tracking is performed. By preemptively identifying and removing images captured during blinks, the system prevents position corruption from occurring, maintaining accurate tracking without requiring complex real-time correction mechanisms during the tracking process itself

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentEP3804608B1System, method, and computer program for rejecting full and partial blinks for retinal tracking
Publication Date: 2026.01.07 OPTOS PLC
  • EP3804608B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3804608B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3804608B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~3c

AI summary

A method, system, and computer-readable medium, for detecting whether an eye blink or non-blink is captured in the image. The method includes filtering, from the image, one or more objects that are predicted to be unsuitable for determining whether an eye blink or no-blink is captured in the image, to provide a filtered image. The method also includes correlating the filtered image with a reference image, and determining, based on the correlating, whether the eye blink or non-blink is captured in the image. The eye blink is a full eye blink or a partial eye blink, and the images may be sequentially captured IR SLO images, in one example embodiment herein. Images determined to include an eye blink can be omitted from inclusion in a final (e.g., OCT) image.