Retinal Rake Impedance Detection for Tissue Differentiation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

During vitreoretinal surgery, surgeons face challenges in differentiating between healthy and diseased tissues due to the lack of feedback during the procedure, which can lead to damage to surrounding tissues.

Innovation Solution

A retinal rake equipped with two electrodes that detect electrical impedance differences between various tissues, providing visual, auditory, or tactile signals to indicate the type of tissue in contact, allowing for more precise tissue identification and manipulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If visual observation through slit lamp is used to identify tissue types, then the surgeon can view the interior of the eye, but the surgeon cannot reliably distinguish between healthy and diseased tissues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue differentiation accuracyVSAvoidtissue type information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by providing real-time electrical impedance measurements to the surgeon during surgery. The device continuously monitors impedance values and provides immediate feedback through visual or audible signals, enabling the surgeon to distinguish between healthy and diseased tissues based on their different electrical properties rather than relying solely on visual observation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses electrical impedance as an intermediary parameter to indirectly identify tissue types. Instead of directly observing tissue characteristics through the slit lamp, the device measures electrical impedance between two points and uses this intermediate measurement to infer tissue type, providing information that cannot be obtained through visual observation alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If manual tissue removal based on visual observation is performed, then the surgeon can remove epiretinal membranes, but surrounding healthy tissues may be damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue removal efficiencyVSAvoiddamage to healthy tissues
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The device provides real-time feedback during tissue removal by continuously monitoring electrical impedance. When the impedance values indicate contact with healthy tissue (within normal ranges), the system alerts the surgeon, allowing immediate adjustment of the removal process to avoid damaging healthy tissues while maintaining efficient removal of diseased tissue.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces reliance on mechanical visual inspection with an electrical measurement system. Instead of using the slit lamp and surgeon's visual judgment to identify tissue boundaries, the system uses electrical impedance measurements to detect tissue type, providing more reliable discrimination between healthy and diseased tissues during the mechanical removal process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If electrical impedance measurement is added to the retinal rake, then tissue differentiation capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue identification accuracyVSAvoiddevice structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the retinal rake multi-functional by integrating both mechanical tissue removal capability and electrical impedance measurement functionality into a single device. The same retinal rake that mechanically removes epiretinal membranes also serves as an electrode for electrical measurements, eliminating the need for separate diagnostic equipment and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The device merges the mechanical rake structure with electrical measurement components by incorporating electrodes directly into the rake. This combination allows simultaneous mechanical manipulation and electrical sensing functions, reducing the number of separate components and simplifying the overall device architecture while providing enhanced tissue differentiation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables surgeons to accurately distinguish between healthy and diseased tissues, minimizing damage to surrounding tissues and improving the precision of tissue removal during surgery.

Implementation Method 1

Various in vivo healthy and diseased tissues or fluids within a body have different, detectable electrical conductivities. In a specific example, epiretinal membranes (ERMs) have a relatively high electrical impedance, which causes them to be relatively electrically inactive. However, retinal tissue has a lower electrical impedance, which causes it to be relatively electrically active.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical impedance: Electrical Resistance

Data Source

PatentEP2061393B1Device for differentiating between tissue types
Publication Date: 2011.05.18 UNIV OF FLORIDA RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • EP2061393B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2061393B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2061393B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

The subject invention utilizes the characteristics of in vivo tissue impedances to provide an embodiment of a medical instrument capable of providing a visible and/or preferably an audible signal to a surgeon that more clearly indicates which type of tissue(s) is in contact with the instrument. A preferred embodiment comprises a handheld, battery operated retinal rake having two electrodes, wherein at least one electrode is the modified retinal rake. Upon contact with different optical tissues, e.g., epiretinal membranes, retinal tissue, vitreous humor, etc., the electrodes detect varying impedances which are translated by onboard circuitry into various signals that indicate what type of tissue, fluid, structure, etc. is in contact with the retinal rake.