Retractable Arm Pawl Lock to Prevent Collection Box Item Tearing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing item collection receptacles often cause damage or tearing of deposited items due to internal components when the door is reopened before fully closed, leading to items getting caught, stuck, or ripped.

Innovation Solution

A retractable arm mechanism with a pawl system and emergency compression spring is integrated into the receptacle, ensuring the door cannot be reopened until fully closed, preventing damage by locking the retractable arm in place and allowing slight opening for removing hands or small objects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the door is allowed to reopen before fully closed, then ease of operation is improved, but items get caught, stuck, or torn on internal components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor operation flexibilityVSAvoiditem damage from catching on components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The retractable arm with pawl mechanism proactively prevents the door from reopening before fully closed by mechanically blocking the door's movement path. The pawl engages with the outer tube to create a physical barrier that stops the door before it can catch items, eliminating the harmful effect before it can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The retractable arm acts as an intermediary mechanism between the door and the internal components. It provides a controlled interface that allows the door to open and close while preventing direct contact between the door and items that could cause catching or tearing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If the retractable arm is locked in place, then item protection is improved, but the door cannot be reopened for removing hands or small objects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from tearingVSAvoiddoor reopenability for safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The resilient element allows for partial reopening of the door beyond the normal locked position, providing just enough additional movement to remove hands or small objects without fully compromising the protective function. This partial action satisfies safety needs while maintaining adequate item protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The resilient element acts as a cushioning mechanism that allows controlled deviation from the locked position. It provides a buffer that permits limited door movement for safety purposes while maintaining the overall protective function, cushioning against the need for complete door reopening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If the pawl engages with the aperture to lock the arm, then reliability of item protection is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor locking reliabilityVSAvoidretractable arm mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pawl mechanism is self-actuating through the resilient element. When the door closes, the resilient element automatically pushes the pawl into engagement with the aperture, locking the arm without requiring additional actuators, sensors, or control systems. This self-service approach maintains high reliability while minimizing added complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex electronic locking systems with a purely mechanical pawl-and-aperture engagement mechanism. This mechanical substitution achieves reliable locking through simple geometric interlocking and elastic force, avoiding the complexity of motors, sensors, and control electronics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Prevents damage to items by ensuring the door is fully closed before reopening, safeguarding against tearing or catching on internal components, while allowing minimal opening for safe operation.

Implementation Method 1

a resilient element disposed within a channel within the inner tube configured to interact with a ridge disposed in a first end of the channel, and wherein the resilient element is moveable between a designated preload and an emergency compressed position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11337538B2Anti-tearing retractable arm for a collection box
Publication Date: 2022.05.24 US POSTAL SERVICE
  • US11337538B2 patent drawing
  • US11337538B2 patent drawing
  • US11337538B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A retractable arm device, system, and method with a locking mechanism for preventing items placed in a device or receptacle from getting stuck, damaged, or torn. The retractable arm includes an inner tube, a pawl, and an outer tube surrounding the inner tube. The inner tube slides within the outer tube and the pawl preventing the retractable arm from moving into an extended position under particular conditions. The retractable arm may be placed in a receptacle for items to prevent the door from being reopened before the door is fully closed.