Individually Retractable Cargo Restraints for Flexible Load Configurations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cargo restraint systems in aircraft limit the number of available cargo load configurations by gang-actuating multiple restraints, preventing individual restraints from being selectively rotated to a stowed position.

Innovation Solution

A cargo restraint system featuring a restraint mechanism with a plunger and torsion spring, allowing individual restraints to be actuated independently or in groups, enabling selective rotation between raised and stowed positions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If multiple restraints are gang-actuated from a single point, then ease of operation is improved, but adaptability deteriorates because individual restraints cannot be selectively positioned

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The restraint system is segmented into multiple independently controllable units. Each restraint assembly (102, 104, 106) can be individually actuated between raised and stowed positions, allowing selective positioning while maintaining group actuation capability through the common actuator shaft (150).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static gang-actuated mechanism to a dynamic system where restraints can be selectively positioned. The plunger mechanism (170) with engagement and disengagement states enables each restraint to be dynamically controlled independently or as part of a group, providing adaptability while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If individual restraints are made selectively retractable, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional mechanisms required

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The actuator shaft (150) and plunger mechanism (170) serve multiple functions: they enable both individual restraint actuation and group actuation, provide engagement/disengagement control, and maintain structural support. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate mechanisms for each function, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If restraints are gang-actuated, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity deteriorates due to limited cargo load configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The restraint system is divided into independently controllable segments (restraint assemblies 102, 104, 106), each with its own plunger mechanism (170). This segmentation allows different combinations of restraints to be positioned according to specific cargo configurations, increasing productivity by enabling multiple cargo load arrangements without requiring completely different restraint systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If individual restraint control is implemented, then adaptability is improved, but ease of operation worsens due to increased control requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges individual restraint control capability with group actuation functionality through the common actuator shaft (150) and plunger mechanism (170). Operators can control restraints individually by selectively engaging/disengaging plungers, or actuate all restraints simultaneously through the shared actuator shaft, maintaining ease of operation while providing adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution allows for increased flexibility in cargo load configurations by enabling individual restraint actuation, while maintaining the ability to actuate restraints as a group from a single point.

Implementation Method 1

A plunger torsion spring may be configured to apply a first biasing load to the plunger lever

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorsion spring: Torsion Spring

Implementation Method 2

A compression spring may be configured to bias a first end of the plunger away from an upper surface of the head

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression spring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS12234031B2Cargo restraint system with individually retractable restraints
Publication Date: 2025.02.25 GOODRICH CORP
  • US12234031B2 patent drawing
  • US12234031B2 patent drawing
  • US12234031B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cargo restraint system may comprise a restraint and an actuator shaft configured to rotate the restraint between a raised position and a stowed position. The restraint may include a head configured to rotate about an axis and a plunger configured to translate between an engaged state and a disengaged state. When the plunger is in the engaged state, the head is rotationally coupled to the actuator shaft. When the plunger is in the disengaged state, the head can rotate independently of the actuator shaft.