Retractable Hard Top with Split Segments and Trunk Lid Window

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Retractable hard top systems for convertible vehicles face issues with complex mechanical and electronic systems, leading to increased production and maintenance costs, reduced reliability, and limited luggage space due to inefficient storage and access.

Innovation Solution

A retractable hard top design that splits into two horizontal segments connected to the front and rear pillars, with a rear window frame placed on the trunk lid, allowing for easier access and storage by folding components into lateral areas of the trunk, reducing the complexity of the articulating mechanism.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the hard top is divided into three segments with concave-convex stacking, then storage efficiency is improved, but the mechanical system becomes very complex and reliability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage efficiencyVSAvoidmechanical system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hard top is divided into two main segments (first hard top segment and second hard top segment) that can be independently positioned. This segmentation allows the roof to be stored in a compact configuration within the trunk while using a simpler mechanical articulation system compared to three-segment designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent positions the rear window and its frame on the trunk lid (vertical dimension) rather than stacking segments horizontally. The first and second hard top segments are folded into the lateral parts of the trunk, utilizing vertical and lateral space more efficiently. This dimensional reorganization achieves compact storage without requiring complex concave-convex articulation mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Volume of moving object

If the hard top uses a complex articulating mechanism for stacking, then storage efficiency is improved, but production and maintenance costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage efficiencyVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The hard top is divided into two main segments (first hard top segment and second hard top segment) that can be independently positioned. This segmentation allows the roof to be stored in a compact configuration within the trunk while using a simpler mechanical articulation system compared to three-segment designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent positions the rear window and its frame on the trunk lid (vertical dimension) rather than stacking segments horizontally. The first and second hard top segments are folded into the lateral parts of the trunk, utilizing vertical and lateral space more efficiently. This dimensional reorganization achieves compact storage without requiring complex concave-convex articulation mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Volume of moving object

If the hard top components are stored in the luggage compartment, then storage efficiency is improved, but access to luggage becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage efficiencyVSAvoidluggage access
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent positions the rear window and its frame on the trunk lid (vertical dimension) rather than stacking segments horizontally. The first and second hard top segments are folded into the lateral parts of the trunk, utilizing vertical and lateral space more efficiently. This dimensional reorganization achieves compact storage without requiring complex concave-convex articulation mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The rear window and its frame are extracted from the main hard top structure and positioned separately on the trunk lid. This allows the trunk lid to remain accessible for luggage while the roof components are stored in the lateral parts of the trunk, separating the storage function from the access path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Strength

If the rear window is integrated with the hard top segments, then structural integrity is improved, but storage space and access are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidstorage space
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The hard top is divided into two main segments (first hard top segment and second hard top segment) that can be independently positioned. This segmentation allows the roof to be stored in a compact configuration within the trunk while using a simpler mechanical articulation system compared to three-segment designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The rear window and its frame are extracted from the main hard top structure and positioned separately on the trunk lid. This allows the trunk lid to remain accessible for luggage while the roof components are stored in the lateral parts of the trunk, separating the storage function from the access path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP3288788B1Method of functioning the retractable hard top system for convertible vehicles
Publication Date: 2020.09.16 VILCELARU DANIEL
  • EP3288788B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3288788B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3288788B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Method of functioning the retractable hard top system for convertible vehicles which implies splitting the ceiling in the middle (throught the longitudinal axis of the vehicle), mooving the rearwindow with the frame-like area arrount it on top of the trunk lid, opening the upper areas of the rear wings and folding compactly the remaining components of the roof inside the lateral areas of the trunk. This method significantly increases the usable volume of the luggage compartment and offers an easier access to the items carried in the trunk. Also, this method requires a less complex operation system which leads to less expensive manufactoring and maintenance costs.