Retractable Plunger Touch Sensor for 3D Printer Spatial Constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing touch sensors for 3D printers and machine tools are bulky due to the need for complex structures and high power consumption, leading to spatial restrictions and inefficiencies, especially when detecting objects made of non-specific materials.

Innovation Solution

A touch sensor with a solenoid and a plunger equipped with a permanent magnet, where the plunger is pushed into the main body case by a detection object to generate a detection signal, allowing for compact size and low power consumption, and is retractable upon command.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a complex structure with servo motor and servo arm is used to detect object position, then detection function is achieved, but device volume increases and spatial restriction occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection functionVSAvoiddevice volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential detection function from the complex servo motor-servo arm system and implements it through a simplified plunger-based mechanical switch structure. The plunger directly contacts the object to be detected and triggers a switch, eliminating unnecessary components while maintaining detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the electromechanical servo motor system with a purely mechanical plunger-spring-switch system. The spring provides restoring force to return the plunger to initial position, and the mechanical switch directly detects plunger displacement, substituting complex electronic control with simple mechanical action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If high power consumption components are used for automatic detection, then detection speed improves, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection speedVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic action through the spring-plunger mechanism where the plunger is rapidly pushed out upon switch activation and then automatically returns to initial position via spring force. This periodic mechanical action enables quick detection cycles without continuous power consumption, as the spring stores and releases energy mechanically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The spring mechanism serves itself by automatically returning the plunger to its initial position after detection, without requiring external power input. The system uses the stored elastic potential energy in the spring to reset the mechanism, making the detection cycle self-sustaining after initial activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If non-retractable plunger structure is used, then detection simplicity improves, but interference with next operation occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure simplicityVSAvoidoperation interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic behavior in the plunger structure, transitioning from static to movable state upon detection. The plunger is initially retracted, then pushed out during detection, and automatically returns to retracted position via spring force, enabling the structure to adapt its state based on operational requirements without complex control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The spring mechanism pre-positiones the plunger in a retracted state before detection, preventing interference with subsequent operations. The preliminary retraction ensures the plunger is ready for the next detection cycle and cannot interfere with objects or operations that occur after the current detection completes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables quick and efficient sensing with reduced power consumption and spatial requirements, suitable for various materials, improving output quality and reducing labor costs.

Implementation Method 1

a solenoid 110 wound on a bobbin 101

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolenoid: Solenoid

Implementation Method 2

a plunger 130 formed on an upper end thereof with a permanent magnet 131; a core 120 positioned at a central portion of the solenoid 110 to interact with magnetic force of the permanent magnet 131

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic force interaction: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS10415948B2Touch sensor
Publication Date: 2019.09.17 LEE KYUNG YEON
  • US10415948B2 patent drawing
  • US10415948B2 patent drawing
  • US10415948B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a touch sensor and, more particularly, to a touch sensor having a solenoid provided therein, wherein the touch sensor: after a plunger is pushed out of a main body case thereof when a detected start command is input, detects the plunger being pushed into the main body case by means of a detected object (bed) and generates a detection signal; and when a detection end command is input, allows the plunger to be pushed in, thereby removing hindering elements that arise and solving spatial limitations while 3D printing or operating machine tools. Also, the touch sensor is capable of carrying out a detecting function quickly and at a low power consumption and enables manpower to be reduced.