Retracting device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing self-closing drawer mechanisms require minimal force to close but generate uncomfortable restoring forces when opening, and previous designs either increase friction, require additional space, or are costly due to unnecessary path-dependent force and deflection.

Innovation Solution

A retraction device using a combination of at least two springs, including a tension spring and a compression spring, arranged concentrically or in a cascaded manner to minimize restoring forces and maintain a compact design, with the option of using spiral springs for increased deflection in a small space.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a single spring is used in the self-closing mechanism, then the restoring force increases path-dependently when the furniture part is opened, but this creates uncomfortable pull-out forces for the user

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverestoring forceVSAvoidpull-out force comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The single spring is segmented into multiple springs (first spring and second spring) that are coupled together. This segmentation allows the total spring deflection to be distributed across multiple components, reducing the path-dependent force increase that occurs with a single long spring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If a longer spring is used to reduce restoring forces, then the pull-out force comfort improves, but additional frictional forces act on the spring and additional space is required transversely

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepull-out force comfortVSAvoidtransverse space
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The first spring and second spring are arranged concentrically, with one spring nested inside the other. This nesting arrangement allows multiple springs to occupy the same transverse space, reducing the overall footprint while maintaining the benefits of distributed spring deflection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Ease of operation

If a longer spring is used to reduce restoring forces, then the pull-out force comfort improves, but additional frictional forces act on the spring

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepull-out force comfortVSAvoidfrictional forces
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the spring system into multiple shorter springs coupled together, the total deflection is distributed. Each individual spring experiences less deflection and thus generates fewer frictional forces against its guides, while still achieving the overall force reduction benefit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of operation

If multiple springs are used to reduce restoring forces, then the pull-out force comfort improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepull-out force comfortVSAvoidspring arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The concentric arrangement of multiple springs within a common guide structure simplifies the overall device complexity. Instead of requiring separate guides and mounting points for each spring, the nested configuration allows multiple springs to share the same spatial envelope and guidance system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution reduces path-dependent restoring forces, minimizes discomfort during opening, and achieves a compact, cost-effective design by distributing the spring deflection evenly, resulting in a smaller overall spring constant and reduced assembly complexity.

Implementation Method 1

a compression spring (6) arranged around a tension spring (7), wherein the compression spring (6) is supported on the housing (2) on one side and coupled to a connecting piece (9) on the other side, which in turn is connected to the tension spring (7)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression spring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

at least one spring is designed as a tension spring and at least one spring as a compression spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTension spring: Spring

Data Source

PatentEP1931231B1Retracting device
Publication Date: 2017.06.21 PAUL HETTICH GMBH & CO KG
  • EP1931231B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1931231B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2C
  • EP1931231B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

The invention relates to a retracting device, in particular for drawers, comprising a housing (2) on which a driver (3) is guided, wherein said driver (3) is movable from a drawing-in to a parking position against a spring force and is coupled to a closable furniture part for holding it in the closed position thereof. According to said invention, the driver (3) is prestressed in the drawing-in position by means of at least two springs (6, 7, 16) which are coupled therebetween by means of a connecting part (9, 9', 90). The use of individual springs (6, 7, 16) makes it possible to obtain an important spring path for a compact structure.