Retracting Lock Mechanism for Electronics Modules

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing compact locking mechanisms for securing modules within cages are complex, expensive, fragile, and require additional force to retract, often getting caught and failing to efficiently manage electromagnetic interference in densely packed electronics.

Innovation Solution

A retractable locking mechanism utilizing a lever and slider block assembly with dual cams, allowing for easy module removal and efficient storage, featuring a robust design with balanced force distribution to prevent fatigue and minimize electromagnetic interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If a compact locking mechanism is used to secure modules within cages, then the device size is reduced, but the mechanism becomes complex, expensive, and fragile

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice sizeVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is divided into distinct functional components: a lock member with locking projections, a carrier with receptacles, and an actuating member. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function independently, simplifying the overall design while maintaining compactness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The actuating member is designed to be removable from the carrier. This extraction capability allows the actuating member to be stored separately when not in use, reducing the space required within the cage assembly and simplifying the mechanism when the actuator is detached.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If an actuating member is used to retract biased projections, then the carrier can be removed from the receptacle, but additional force is required and the device becomes fragile

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarrier removalVSAvoidretraction force
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism transitions from a static locked state to a dynamic unlocked state through the actuating member. The biased locking projections are designed to be elastically deformable, allowing them to dynamically adjust during the unlocking process and reduce the force needed for carrier removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The locking projections are pre-biased with elastic force that cushions the unlocking action. This beforehand cushioning allows the projections to flex and absorb the forces involved in unlocking, reducing the peak force required and preventing fragile components from breaking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Volume of moving object

If modules are densely packed in compact electronics, then space efficiency is improved, but electromagnetic interference increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace efficiencyVSAvoidelectromagnetic interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The actuating member is extracted from the carrier when not in use, allowing it to be stored in a separate location outside the cage. This removes potential sources of electromagnetic interference from the dense electronic environment, while still enabling the locking function when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The mechanism provides a reliable, force-efficient, and space-efficient locking solution that reduces the risk of breakage and minimizes electromagnetic interference, enabling easy module replacement and efficient storage in compact electronic systems.

Implementation Method 1

a lever having a handle end opposite a rotation end and a pivot point positioned between the handle end and the rotation end such that the lever pivots about an axis of rotation of the lever

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLever: Lever

Implementation Method 2

a first cam positioned on the rotation end of the lever; a second cam attached to the lock for bearing on the back end of the actuator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCam: Cam

Data Source

PatentUS8040687B2Retracting lock mechanism for an electronics device
Publication Date: 2011.10.18 METHODE ELECTRONICS INC
  • US8040687B2 patent drawing
  • US8040687B2 patent drawing
  • US8040687B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A retractable locking mechanism comprising: a lever having a handle end opposite a rotation end and a pivot point positioned between the handle end and the rotation end such that the lever pivots about an axis of rotation of the lever; a first cam positioned on the rotation end of the lever; an actuator with a front end and a back end, the front end attached to the pivot point of the lever; a lock disposed adjacent to the actuator and the lock having a first end and a second end and an axis of rotation of the lock; a second cam attached to the lock for bearing on the back end of the actuator; and wherein pivoting the lever moves the actuator along a plane of the actuator to contact and rotate the second cam such that the lock is disposed in one of a locked state and an unlocked state.