Sensor-Enabled Retractor Feedback for Robotic Surgery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Surgical retraction techniques often cause tissue damage and require frequent manual adjustments, leading to surgical inefficiency and increased risk, as existing retractors lack real-time monitoring and automatic adjustment capabilities.

Innovation Solution

Sensor-enabled retractors equipped with force, pressure, optical, and neuromonitoring sensors, coupled with a surgical robot arm and controller, provide real-time data on retracted anatomy health, enabling automatic and minor adjustments to maintain tissue health without interrupting the procedure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual retractor adjustment is performed frequently to prevent tissue damage, then tissue health is improved, but surgical efficiency deteriorates due to procedure interruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue healthVSAvoidsurgical efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements real-time feedback through sensors (force sensors, pressure sensors, optical sensors, neuromonitoring sensors) that continuously monitor tissue health parameters. This feedback loop enables the system to detect when tissue is approaching damage thresholds and automatically adjust retraction forces, eliminating the need for frequent manual interruptions while maintaining tissue health.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The retractor system performs self-adjustment through automated control mechanisms that respond to sensor data. The system monitors its own performance and automatically modifies retraction forces to prevent tissue damage, eliminating the need for external manual intervention and maintaining continuous surgical operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If extended retraction force is applied to maintain access to surgical site, then surgical access is improved, but tissue damage increases due to fatigue and necrosis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical accessVSAvoidtissue damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic adjustment of retraction forces based on real-time tissue condition monitoring. Rather than applying static extended forces, the system continuously adapts retraction magnitude to maintain optimal access while preventing tissue damage thresholds from being exceeded, allowing prolonged surgical access without necrosis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes physical parameters (retraction force, pressure, position) based on sensor feedback to maintain tissue health. By dynamically adjusting these parameters, the system preserves surgical access while preventing the harmful effects of excessive or prolonged retraction forces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If retractor position is changed to avoid tissue damage, then tissue health is improved, but surgical procedure time increases due to repositioning requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue healthVSAvoidprocedure time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Real-time sensor feedback enables continuous monitoring of tissue health parameters, allowing the system to detect early signs of stress or damage. This early detection permits minor positional adjustments before significant damage occurs, reducing the need for major repositioning interruptions and minimizing procedure time while maintaining tissue health.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary monitoring and detection of tissue stress conditions before damage occurs. By detecting early signs of tissue compromise, the system can make preventive minor adjustments, avoiding the need for time-consuming major repositioning operations later in the procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250295401A1Sensor enabled retractor for robotic surgery
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 DEPUY (IRELAND) LTD
  • US20250295401A1 patent drawing
  • US20250295401A1 patent drawing
  • US20250295401A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Sensor-enabled surgical retractor devices, systems, and methods are disclosed herein that can be coupled to a surgical robot during a robotic or robot-assisted surgical procedure to maintain health of retracted anatomy and prolong the amount of time until a surgical procedure must be interrupted to adjust a retractor. In some embodiments, interruption of a surgical procedure can be avoided by providing for minor and, in some cases, automatically administered, adjustment of retractor devices to alleviate pressure on retracted tissue without requiring surgeon attention or intervention. Fine (e.g., minor) adjustments to the retractor can be made automatically over the course of a surgical procedure to prevent damage to retracted anatomy and increase the time until a major adjustment of the retractor is needed.