Retrieval-Augmented Reinforcement Learning for Contextual Action Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Reinforcement learning systems face challenges in efficiently and scalably incorporating relevant contextual information for action selection, particularly when dealing with large-scale datasets and diverse observation modalities, which limits their effectiveness in real-world applications.

Innovation Solution

A reinforcement learning system that integrates a retrieval-augmented action selection process, utilizing a retrieval dataset to dynamically retrieve relevant experience data through an embedding and encoder neural network, enabling efficient and scalable lookup of contextual information for improved agent control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If reinforcement learning systems use traditional action selection methods without retrieval augmentation, then the system complexity remains lower, but the ability to incorporate relevant contextual information from large-scale datasets is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontextual informationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a retrieval module as an intermediary component between the observation input and action selection. This module retrieves relevant contextual information from a retrieval dataset using query vectors generated from current observations, thereby preserving important contextual information without requiring the entire dataset to be processed, thus managing system complexity effectively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The action selection process is segmented into distinct components: observation encoding, query generation, retrieval operations, and action selection. This segmentation allows the system to handle large-scale datasets by processing only relevant portions through the retrieval mechanism, reducing information loss while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If reinforcement learning systems process large-scale retrieval datasets to find relevant contextual information, then the quality of action selection improves, but the computational time and processing speed decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaction selection qualityVSAvoidcomputational speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary encoding of observations into query vectors before the retrieval operation. This preliminary action prepares the query in an optimized format that enables efficient similarity search in the retrieval dataset, improving action selection quality while minimizing the computational time required during actual retrieval

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces brute-force sequential search mechanisms with vector-based similarity search and neural network-based retrieval. This substitution uses mathematical vector operations and learned representations to quickly identify relevant contextual information from large datasets, significantly improving computational speed while maintaining high action selection quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If reinforcement learning systems incorporate retrieval augmentation with embedding neural networks, then the ability to handle diverse observation modalities improves, but the device complexity and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobservation modality handlingVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The embedding neural network serves as a universal component that handles diverse observation modalities by converting them into a common vector representation space. This multi-functional embedding layer enables the retrieval system to process different types of observations (visual, textual, sensor data) uniformly, improving adaptability while managing computational resources through a shared representation mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250335439A1Large-scale retrieval augmented reinforcement learning
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 GDM HOLDING LLC
  • US20250335439A1 patent drawing
  • US20250335439A1 patent drawing
  • US20250335439A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer storage medium, for controlling a reinforcement learning agent in an environment to perform a task. In one aspect, a method comprises: maintaining a retrieval dataset that stores a plurality of history observations and, for each history observation, a respective associated context; receiving a current observation characterizing a current state of the environment; selecting one or more history observations from the plurality of history observations; processing, using an encoder neural network and in accordance with current values of encoder network parameters, an encoder network input comprising (i) the current observation and (ii) the one or more selected history observations and their respective associated context to generate a latent state representation for the current state of the environment; and using the latent state representation to determine an action to be performed by the agent in response to the current observation.