Retrofit Controller for Dynamic Injection Molding Load Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional injection molding machines are limited by manufacturer-set safety margins, which restrict their operational efficiency and output, as they are often configured to operate below their maximum load capacity, leading to suboptimal performance even in favorable conditions due to the reliance on conservative safety settings and lack of real-time adjustments.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a secondary retrofit controller that dynamically adjusts operating parameters to allow the machine to operate near its maximum load capacity, enabling real-time monitoring and adjustment to optimize efficiency and output, while maintaining safety by staying within predetermined load limits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manufacturer-set safety margins are used to constrain operating parameters, then machine reliability is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine reliabilityVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts operating parameters based on real-time monitoring of machine conditions and environmental factors. The controller continuously modifies injection parameters within safe operating limits rather than using fixed manufacturer constraints, allowing the machine to adapt to changing conditions and operate closer to its actual capacity while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements real-time feedback monitoring of machine load, temperature, and other critical parameters. This feedback loop enables the controller to adjust operating parameters dynamically, ensuring the machine operates within safe limits while maximizing productivity by utilizing the full range of safe operating conditions rather than relying on conservative fixed margins

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If operator intervention is required to adjust operating parameters, then adaptability is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoidloss of time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-adjustment of operating parameters through automated monitoring and control. The controller independently responds to changing conditions by modifying injection parameters without requiring operator intervention, thereby maintaining adaptability while eliminating the time loss associated with manual adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Real-time feedback from sensors monitoring machine load and environmental conditions enables the controller to automatically adjust operating parameters. This closed-loop control system provides both adaptability to changing conditions and time efficiency by eliminating the delay inherent in operator response and manual adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If conservative safety factors are applied, then reliability is improved, but productivity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces static conservative safety factors with dynamic parameter adjustment based on real-time machine conditions. The controller continuously adapts operating parameters within the safe operating envelope, allowing the machine to operate closer to its actual capacity while maintaining reliability through continuous monitoring and adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operating parameters dynamically based on monitored conditions rather than applying fixed conservative safety factors. By adjusting parameters such as injection pressure, temperature, and cycle time in real-time, the system maximizes productivity while maintaining reliability through continuous adaptation to actual machine capabilities and environmental conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP3416800B1Injection molding controller interface with user-adjustable variables
Publication Date: 2019.04.24 IMFLUX INC
  • EP3416800B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3416800B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3416800B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An injection molding machine uses a native controller and a retrofit controller to effectively control its operation. The controllers may determine and/or receive information regarding the machine's maximum load capacity, and may also determine a current operational load value of the machine. The retrofit controller may cause the machine to operate at any number of combinations of settings of operational parameters which result in the machine operating at or below the maximum load value by adjusting any number of machine parameters associated with the injection molding machine based on feedback sensors measuring real-time operating conditions of the machine.