Retroreflective Articles with Cube Corners and Adhesive Barrier

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Retroreflective sheeting technologies face challenges with sealing films that reduce active area, increase manufacturing costs, and create undesirable patterns, while metalized cube corners lack sufficient durability and whiteness for daytime viewing.

Innovation Solution

The development of retroreflective articles without sealing films or metalized cube corners, utilizing a structured surface with cube corner elements and a pressure sensitive adhesive, where a low refractive index layer and barrier layer prevent adhesive flow and maintain retroreflectivity, creating optically active and inactive areas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sealing films are used to protect the air interface of cube corner elements, then retroreflective light intensity is maintained, but the total active area is reduced and manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretroreflective light intensityVSAvoidtotal active area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the sealing film from the retroreflective sheeting structure, extracting the protective function and replacing it with an adhesive layer that bonds the sheeting to the substrate. This eliminates the sealing film's obstruction of the active area while maintaining protection through alternative means.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the adhesive function and the protective function into a single adhesive layer. This layer both bonds the retroreflective sheeting to the substrate and protects the cube corner elements, eliminating the need for a separate sealing film and thereby preserving active area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If sealing films are used to protect the air interface of cube corner elements, then retroreflective light intensity is maintained, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretroreflective light intensityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the adhesive function and the protective function into a single adhesive layer. This layer both bonds the retroreflective sheeting to the substrate and protects the cube corner elements, eliminating the need for a separate sealing film and thereby reducing manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent removes the sealing film from the structure, extracting its protective function and replacing it with the adhesive layer. This simplifies the manufacturing process and reduces material costs while maintaining the necessary protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If metalized cube corners are used for retroreflection, then durability is improved, but whiteness and daytime viewing quality are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidwhiteness for daytime viewing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a composite structure combining cube corner elements made from materials with high refractive index (for durability and retroreflective performance) with a white pigmented adhesive layer (for daytime whiteness). This composite approach achieves both durability and adequate whiteness for daytime viewing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different properties to different parts of the system: the cube corner elements provide durability and retroreflective function, while the white pigmented adhesive layer provides daytime visibility and whiteness. Each component is optimized for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances retroreflectivity, reduces manufacturing costs, and provides a uniform appearance without the need for sealing films, while ensuring durability and adequate whiteness for daytime visibility.

Implementation Method 1

The one or more optically active areas include a low refractive index layer or material adjacent to a portion of the structured surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefraction: Refraction

Implementation Method 2

The one or more optically inactive areas include a pressure sensitive adhesive adjacent to a portion of the structured surface. The pressure sensitive adhesive substantially destroys the retroreflectivity of the portions of the structured surface that are directly adjacent thereto.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 3

The barrier layer has sufficient structural integrity to substantially prevent flow of the pressure sensitive adhesive into the low refractive index layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical containment: Physical Containment

Implementation Method 4

Generally, light that is incident on a corner cube element from a light source is totally internally reflected from each of the three perpendicular cube corner optical faces and is redirected back toward the light source

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTotal internal reflection: Total Internal Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS10859738B2Retroreflective articles including optically active areas and optically inactive areas
Publication Date: 2020.12.08 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO
  • US10859738B2 patent drawing
  • US10859738B2 patent drawing
  • US10859738B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure generally relates to retroreflective articles and methods of making such articles.