Information Processing Device Return Address Integrity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods fail to prevent tampering of return addresses and unauthorized branching in information processing devices, particularly during the timing between authentication code verification and return instruction execution, and are unable to detect skipped authentication code verification instructions.

Innovation Solution

An information processing device with a memory unit and processing unit that executes a determination process to verify if the instruction at a specific address is an authentication code verification instruction, and checks for match or mismatch of the authentication code after executing a return instruction, thereby detecting tampering and unauthorized branching.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If authentication code verification is performed before return instruction execution, then return address integrity is protected, but vulnerability exists during the timing gap between verification completion and return instruction execution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereturn address integrityVSAvoidtiming gap vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent places an authentication code verification instruction at the return address location in advance. When a return instruction is executed, the processor automatically jumps to this pre-placed verification instruction, which then verifies the authentication code before continuing execution. This preliminary arrangement eliminates the timing gap vulnerability by ensuring verification is inherently part of the return flow path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the authentication code verification instruction checks whether the return address matches the expected address stored in the authentication code. If there is a mismatch (indicating tampering), the verification fails and the system can take corrective action. This feedback loop ensures that any tampering attempt is detected and prevented.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If authentication code verification instruction is skipped with malicious intent, then attack detection is needed, but existing verification methods cannot detect skipped instructions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattack detection capabilityVSAvoiddetection mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent pre-places the authentication code verification instruction at the return address location in the instruction sequence. This ensures that when a return instruction is executed, the processor must sequentially execute this verification instruction. Any attempt to skip or bypass this instruction would result in executing unauthorized code, which can be detected by monitoring the instruction flow or by the verification failure itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The authentication code verification instruction acts as an intermediary between the return instruction and the subsequent code execution. It serves as a gatekeeper that must be executed and pass verification before allowing normal execution to continue. This intermediary mechanism inherently detects skipped instructions because the verification step cannot be bypassed without executing unauthorized code.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If return address is tampered aiming at timing between verification completion and return instruction execution, then prevention becomes impossible with existing methods, but post-return verification can detect such tampering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetampering detectionVSAvoidoperation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent arranges the authentication code verification instruction at the return address location in advance, so that when a return instruction is executed, the processor automatically jumps to and executes this verification instruction before continuing. This preliminary placement ensures that any tampering of the return address is detected at the moment of return, eliminating the vulnerability window that exists in traditional methods where verification occurs before the return instruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250013730A1Information processing device and information processing method
Publication Date: 2025.01.09 SONY SEMICON SOLUTIONS CORP
  • US20250013730A1 patent drawing
  • US20250013730A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure is provided with a memory unit including a stack area, and an information processing unit. The information processing unit executes, after executing a return instruction to a specific address, a determination process configured to determine whether an instruction placed at the specific address is an authentication code verification instruction, and verifies, in a case where the instruction placed at the specific address is consequently determined as the authentication code verification instruction, match or mismatch of an authentication code by executing the authentication code verification instruction.