Automated Return Processing with Image Analysis and Business Rules

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The process of handling product returns for electronic devices is often nontransparent to consumers, lacking real-time status updates and adequate monitoring, which can lead to inefficiencies and product loss.

Innovation Solution

An automated product management system that includes image capturing and storing devices, along with an instruction processing unit to perform image analysis and apply business rules for determining the acceptance of product return requests, providing real-time tracking and loss prevention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If basic status updates are provided during product transport and servicing, then consumer information needs are partially met, but real-time monitoring and detailed product condition data are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct condition dataVSAvoidmonitoring system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system captures images of the electronic device at the beginning of the processing workflow, before any servicing or transport operations. This preliminary documentation establishes a baseline condition that can be compared against subsequent images to detect changes, eliminating the need for continuous monitoring during each processing stage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of continuously monitoring the actual device throughout the supply chain, the system creates visual copies (images) of the device at key processing points. These image copies are stored and analyzed to track device condition, providing sufficient information without requiring the device to be physically present or continuously monitored at every location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If automated image analysis and business rule processing are implemented, then processing accuracy and transparency are improved, but system complexity and initial setup requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereturn acceptance determinationVSAvoidprocessing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs image analysis and applies business rules without requiring manual intervention from processors. The automated determination of whether to accept return requests eliminates human subjectivity and inconsistency, providing precise, objective decisions based on captured images and predefined criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual inspection and decision-making processes are replaced with automated image analysis algorithms and computer-based business rule processing. This substitution of mechanical/human operations with automated systems increases precision while the modular architecture manages complexity through standardized processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If comprehensive image capture and analysis is performed at all processing points, then product loss is minimized and transparency is maximized, but processing time and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct loss preventionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Images are captured at the beginning of the processing workflow and at key transition points, rather than continuously throughout processing. This preliminary and periodic imaging approach provides sufficient data for loss prevention and condition tracking without requiring constant monitoring that would slow down operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system captures images at strategically selected processing points rather than at every possible stage. This partial action approach provides adequate information for reliability and loss prevention while avoiding the time loss and complexity associated with comprehensive continuous monitoring of all processing activities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11004030B2Systems and methods to process product return requests
Publication Date: 2021.05.11 FEDEX SUPPLY CHAIN LOGISTICS & ELECTRONICS INC
  • US11004030B2 patent drawing
  • US11004030B2 patent drawing
  • US11004030B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are embodiments of systems, methods, and computer program products to process product return requests. In one embodiment, the method includes performing image analysis on the electronic device; retrieving business rules governing the warranty plan of a service provider associated with the electronic device; and determining whether the electronic device is accepted under the warranty plan based on the business rules and the image analysis associated with the electronic device.