Returns Computing System for Barcode and Image-Based Authentication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional return processes in e-commerce face challenges in detecting fraudulent items, particularly counterfeit goods, due to the reliance on manual verification by intermediaries who handle returns for multiple entities, leading to inefficiencies and difficulties in identifying lesser-quality items disguised as authorized returns.

Innovation Solution

A returns computing system that utilizes digital item catalogues and pattern recognition to verify items through barcode scanning, and if necessary, employs an image puzzle to assist personnel in identifying authorized items, ensuring efficient and automated verification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual verification by intermediary personnel is used to identify returned items, then the process can handle diverse items from multiple entities, but the accuracy of detecting counterfeit items deteriorates due to personnel inability to recognize all items

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle diverse items from multiple entitiesVSAvoidaccuracy of detecting counterfeit items
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a digital replica of the authorized item's visual characteristics by capturing images and generating an image puzzle. This copying approach allows the system to verify counterfeit items by comparing them against the digital replica, enabling accurate detection without requiring personnel to physically recognize each item type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary verification layer between the returned item and the final authorization decision. The image puzzle acts as a mediator that translates the verification task into a solvable puzzle based on visual characteristics, bridging the gap between personnel capability and verification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If automated verification systems are implemented to improve detection accuracy, then the speed of processing returns increases, but the complexity of the verification system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of processing returnsVSAvoidcomplexity of the verification system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of verification from physical item recognition to solving a visual puzzle based on captured images. This parameter transformation simplifies the system architecture by using standard imaging and puzzle-generation algorithms rather than complex AI recognition systems, achieving automation while controlling complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical process of manual item recognition with an automated image-based verification process. By substituting human visual recognition with automated image capture and puzzle generation, the system achieves faster processing without requiring complex mechanical scanning or identification devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If image puzzles are used to verify item identity, then the accuracy of authentication improves, but the time required for verification increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of item authenticationVSAvoidtime required for verification
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses partial action by capturing only the essential visual characteristics of the item needed for verification, rather than requiring complete item inspection. The image puzzle focuses on key distinguishing features, achieving sufficient accuracy without excessive verification time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by capturing and storing images of authorized items in advance, creating a database of valid item appearances. This preliminary imaging allows rapid verification during return processing, as the system only needs to compare against pre-captured images rather than perform complex real-time analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4617970A1Intelligent processing of returns
Publication Date: 2025.09.17 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICAN INC
  • EP4617970A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4617970A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4617970A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

In general, various embodiments of the present disclosure provide systems, methods, apparatuses, and technologies, and/or the like for processing items for a return. Particular embodiments of the disclosure involve processing the items for a return by verifying that surrendered items for the return are in fact authorized items for the return through the use of digital item catalogues and/or pattern recognition solutions. In addition, particular embodiments of the disclosure involve processing the items for a return by verifying that surrendered items for the return are in fact authorized items for the return through the use of image puzzles.