Reusable Box Blank Locking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing box blanks face challenges in reusability due to insufficient strength under load and damage from interlocking structural features like dart-type locks, which are not well-suited for frequent reuse.

Innovation Solution

A reusable box blank design featuring a locking structure with an overlay panel, slot, flap, and tab, where the tab has a spine and wings that bend away from the coplanar position during insertion and resiliently return to secure the panels in orthogonal positions without adhesives, ensuring robust interlocking without damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If adhesives are used to secure panels in box configuration, then the box structure is strongly secured, but the blank cannot be easily disassembled for reuse

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebox structure strengthVSAvoiddisassembly ease
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking structure is divided into separate components: a locking panel with a locking feature and a counterpanel with a receiving feature. This segmentation allows the panels to be strongly locked together while maintaining the ability to disassemble by simply separating the components without damaging adhesives or the blank itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking feature acts as an intermediary mechanism between panels. It includes a locking member that engages with a receiving member, creating a reversible mechanical connection that provides strong securing during use but allows easy disassembly when needed, eliminating the need for permanent adhesives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If interlocking structural features are used to improve reusability, then easy disassembly is achieved, but the interlocking features suffer from damage under strain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisassembly easeVSAvoidinterlocking feature durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The locking feature utilizes elastic deformation as a key parameter. The locking member is designed to elastically deform during engagement and disengagement, allowing it to flex under strain without permanent damage. This elastic parameter change enables the interlocking feature to maintain durability while providing easy assembly and disassembly through controlled flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If dart-type locks are used for interlocking, then panel securing is achieved, but the dart tab becomes permanently deformed after repeated insertion and removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel securing strengthVSAvoidblank reuse duration
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The locking member is designed with elastic properties that allow it to reversibly deform during engagement and disengagement. This elastic parameter change enables the locking feature to withstand repeated insertion and removal cycles without permanent deformation, significantly extending the blank's reuse duration compared to rigid dart-type locks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The locking structure employs composite design elements combining rigid and flexible components. The locking member incorporates elastic material properties that allow it to flex under stress while maintaining structural integrity, preventing the permanent deformation that occurs with purely rigid dart-type locking mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design allows for secure assembly and disassembly of the box without adhesives, maintaining structural integrity under load and enabling frequent reuse by minimizing damage to the blank's components.

Implementation Method 1

Each of the wings is configured to bend away from the bottom panel from a coplanar position with respect to the spine as the tab is being inserted in the slot. Each of the wings is further configured to resiliently return toward its respective coplanar position when the tab is received in the slot.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUSRE48096E1Reusable box blank
Publication Date: 2020.07.14 INTEPLAST GROUP CORPORATION
  • USRE48096E1 patent drawing
  • USRE48096E1 patent drawing
  • USRE48096E1 patent drawing

AI summary

A blank for being repeatably assembled into a box configuration without the use of adhesives. The blank has a bottom panel, a side panel foldably attached to the bottom panel, an end panel foldably attached to the bottom panel, and a locking structure configured to secure the side panel and the end panel in respective orthogonal positions with respect to the bottom panel. The locking structure includes an overlay panel foldably attached to the end panel and foldable toward an overlying position in which it overlies a portion of the side panel. The locking structure also includes a slot in the bottom panel, a flap foldably attached to the bottom panel and extending into the slot, and a tab foldably attached to the overlay panel for being lockingly received in the slot to secure the overlay panel in the overlying position.