Reusable Concrete Support Beam for Adaptable Building Frames

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Concrete frame buildings face challenges such as inflexibility due to sturdy frames, high construction costs, and environmental impact due to non-reusable support beams, as well as height limitations in traditional roof constructions.

Innovation Solution

A support beam with a T-shaped or I-shaped cross-section and concrete reinforcement volumes, featuring flat recesses for detachable attachment to columns, allowing for modification and reuse, and the use of elastomer blocks for standardized crossbeams to facilitate drainage and reduce costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional concrete frame construction uses grout, cement, or mortar to attach beams to columns, then the frame achieves high strength and stability, but the building becomes impossible to modify and beams cannot be reused

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe strengthVSAvoidbuilding adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The connection between support beams and columns is segmented into detachable components: steel connection elements with anchor bolts in the columns, and corresponding connection plates on the beams. This allows the frame to be assembled and disassembled while maintaining structural integrity during use, resolving the contradiction between strength and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The connection system transitions from static permanent attachment (grout/cement) to dynamic detachable connection (bolts and connection plates). This enables the building structure to be modified or dismantled and reconfigured, achieving both high strength during operation and adaptability when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If custom made beams are used for each location in the concrete frame, then the frame achieves optimal structural performance, but construction costs increase and beam reuse becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural performanceVSAvoidconstruction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Standardized support beams with uniform connection plates and dimensions are designed to work with standardized column connection elements. This universal design allows the same beam type to be used in multiple locations throughout the building, reducing manufacturing complexity and cost while maintaining structural performance through proper engineering of the standardized components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Rather than customizing beam geometry for each location, the invention achieves structural optimization by varying connection parameters (bolt positions, connection plate configurations) and beam positioning, while maintaining standardized beam dimensions and manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional I-shaped support beams are used, then manufacturing is simplified, but the beams cannot protrude through the upper plane formed by crossbeams, reducing useful stacking height

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidstacking height
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The support beam uses an asymmetric T-shaped cross-section where the vertical stem extends significantly beyond the horizontal flange. This asymmetric geometry allows the beam to protrude through the plane formed by crossbeams while maintaining manufacturing simplicity, as the T-shape can be produced using standard formwork and reinforcement techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The T-shaped cross-section adds vertical dimensionality to the beam structure, allowing it to extend through the horizontal plane of crossbeams. This dimensional change enables increased stacking height without complicating the manufacturing process, as the T-shape is a straightforward geometric form.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Adaptability or versatility

If support beams are detachably attached using connection means, then beams can be reused and building modified, but the connection complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam reusabilityVSAvoidconnection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The connection system extracts the fastening function into separate, standardized steel connection elements and bolts, leaving the concrete beams and columns simpler in form. This separation reduces overall complexity by using simple, well-understood mechanical fasteners rather than complex integrated connection details.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Steel connection plates and anchor bolts serve as intermediary elements between the concrete beams and columns. These intermediaries simplify the connection by providing standardized, pre-fabricated components that bridge the concrete elements, reducing the complexity of direct concrete-to-concrete connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP4332319A1Reusable support beam for roof of concrete frame building and a concrete frame building constructed with such support beams
Publication Date: 2024.03.06 KOUTERMOLEN NV
  • EP4332319A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4332319A1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B
  • EP4332319A1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The current invention relates to a support beam for roof support of a concrete frame building, the support beam being formed by a concrete volume extending in a longitudinal direction, having a T-shaped or I-shaped cross-section, formed by a stroke and an arm or by a stroke, a first and second arm, the support beam comprises a concrete reinforcement volume in each corner formed by respectively the stroke and the arm or the stroke and the first arm, the concrete reinforcement volumes bounded by the stroke, the arm and a sloping wall, the support beam comprising at each end and both sides of the stroke a flat recess in the sloping wall, a perforation extending parallel with the stroke from the flat recess through the arm. The invention also relates to a concrete frame building and a method for constructing it.