Interchangeable Refuse Container Assembly with Reversible Support Tubes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing refuse containers are typically unitary structures that cannot be easily modified in shape after fabrication, making it impractical to change their appearance to match different events or venues, and they require significant storage space when not in use.

Innovation Solution

A container assembly comprising a support structure with elongated tubes that reversibly fit into channels on a container, allowing for easy interchange of container shapes and reducing storage needs, while maintaining equivalent or improved physical properties such as impact resistance and volume capacity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If unitary container structures are used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to different events and venues is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different eventsVSAvoidcontainer structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The container system is divided into two independent segments: a reusable support structure and interchangeable container bodies. The support structure contains elongated tubes that can reversibly receive different container shapes, allowing the same base structure to adapt to various events while maintaining manufacturing simplicity for each individual component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support structure is designed as a universal base that can accommodate multiple types of container bodies through its elongated tube system. This multi-functional design allows a single support structure to serve various events by simply changing the container body, eliminating the need to manufacture different support structures for different occasions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If different shaped containers are manufactured for different events, then adaptability is improved, but storage space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different eventsVSAvoidstorage space
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the container system into a permanent support structure and removable container bodies, the design allows container bodies to be stored separately when not in use. Only one container body needs to be stored at a time, significantly reducing storage space requirements compared to keeping multiple complete container assemblies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The container body nests within the support structure during use, with the container's elongated portions fitting into the support's elongated tubes. This nesting arrangement allows compact storage of the container body within or near the support structure when not actively being used for a specific event.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Adaptability or versatility

If container shapes are modified after fabrication, then adaptability is improved, but structural integrity may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape modification capabilityVSAvoidimpact resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The system separates the structural support function (handled by the permanently fabricated support structure with optimized strength) from the shape/aesthetic function (handled by interchangeable container bodies). This allows shape changes through component replacement rather than modification, preserving the structural integrity of the support structure while achieving adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Adaptability or versatility

If lift members are integrated into container sidewalls, then ease of operation is maintained, but adaptability to different shapes is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different shapesVSAvoidlifting capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The lifting function is merged into the support structure through elongated tubes that can reversibly receive lift members. This integration occurs at the structural level rather than in the container sidewalls, allowing different container shapes to be used while maintaining consistent lifting capability through the unified support structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS8181807B2Container assembly
Publication Date: 2012.05.22 NOVA CHEM (INT) SA
  • US8181807B2 patent drawing
  • US8181807B2 patent drawing
  • US8181807B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a container assembly (1) that includes a support structure (11) and a container (14) that resides reversibly within the support structure interior (62). The support structure (11) includes a pair of opposed first and second support sidewalls (26, 29) each having an elongated tube (32, 44) having a first open end (38, 50) and an elongated hollow interior (35, 47). The container (14) has opposing sidewalls (77, 80) that each have an elongated channel (104, 110). The first and second elongated tubes (32, 44) of the support structure (11) are each reversibly received within the first and second elongated sidewall channels (104, 110) of the container (14), as the container is reversibly introduced (e.g., slid) into the support structure interior (62) through the open forward portion (65) of the support structure (11). The container assembly (1) may be reversibly lifted by lift members (e.g., lift forks 119, 122) introduced through the first open ends (38, 50) and into the elongated hollow interiors (35, 47) of the first and second elongated tubes (32, 44) of the support structure (11). At least a portion of the container (e.g., upper container portion 125′) may have a three dimensional shape corresponding to an activity being conducted in the venue in which the container assembly is used, such as, a protective sports helmet shape (e.g., a hockey helmet shape) or a sports ball shape (e.g., a soccer ball shape).