Extensible Behavioral Risk Framework With Reusable ML Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing risk-detection systems require training and maintaining multiple, unique machine learning models for each type of risk, leading to inefficiencies in resource utilization and maintenance burden, as they struggle to adapt to new types of risks.

Innovation Solution

A framework that enables model reuse and composability by combining machine learning models and lexicons to detect violations across various risk types, allowing for rapid expansion of cognitive scenario catalogs and improved analytic outcomes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If distinct machine learning models are trained for each type of risk, then detection accuracy for specific risk types is improved, but device complexity and maintenance burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidnumber of models
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing a single machine learning model framework that can detect multiple types of risks across different domains. The model is trained on diverse data including communications, transactions, and events, enabling it to perform multiple detection functions simultaneously rather than requiring separate specialized models for each risk type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple risk detection capabilities into a unified system. By combining various data sources (communications, transactions, events) and training a single model on this diverse dataset, the system consolidates what would traditionally require multiple separate models into one integrated framework, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple unique machine learning models are maintained for different risk types, then comprehensive risk coverage is achieved, but loss of time and resources for training and maintenance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk coverageVSAvoidtraining and maintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The unified model framework provides comprehensive risk coverage across multiple domains simultaneously. By designing the model to handle diverse risk types from the outset and training it on multi-domain data, the system achieves broad adaptability without requiring separate models for each risk category, thereby eliminating the time and resources needed to train and maintain multiple specialized models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system adapts to detect new types of risks, then adaptability improves, but device complexity and maintenance burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by creating a flexible, adaptable model framework that can evolve to detect new risk types. The system uses diverse training data and a unified architecture that can incorporate new risk categories without requiring structural changes or additional specialized models, allowing dynamic adaptation while maintaining system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250272617A1Extensible machine learning powered behavioral framework for risk coverage
Publication Date: 2025.08.28 DIGITAL REASONING SYSTEMS INC
  • US20250272617A1 patent drawing
  • US20250272617A1 patent drawing
  • US20250272617A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Some aspects of the present disclosure relate to systems, methods and computer readable media for outputting alerts based on potential violations of predetermined standards of behavior. In one example implementation, a computer implemented method includes: training a natural language-based machine learning model to detect at least one risk of a violation condition in an electronic communication between persons, wherein the violation condition is a potential violation of a first predetermined standard of behavior; receiving a lexicon, wherein the lexicon comprises topic data; receiving connection data representing a relationship between the trained machine learning model and the lexicon; detecting, using the trained machine learning model, the lexicon, and the connection data, a potential violation of a second predetermined standard of behavior; and outputting for display an alert indicating the potential violation of the second predetermined standard of behavior.