Reusable Plastic Produce Container with 6-Down Footprint

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current packaging methods for bananas, such as corrugated cardboard boxes and conventional reusable plastic containers, face issues like high costs, environmental impact, damage during transit, load instability, and difficulty in controlling temperature and atmosphere, leading to suboptimal fruit quality and reduced efficiency in shipping and storage.

Innovation Solution

The development of novel plastic shipping containers with a 6-down footprint arrangement, enhanced ventilation, and a unique design that allows for easier stacking and sampling, featuring a three-line configuration of bananas, increased interior volume, and a collapsible structure for efficient use and reuse.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If corrugated cardboard boxes are used for packaging bananas, then the boxes can be easily manufactured and disposed of, but the environmental impact increases and costs rise due to single-use disposal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidenvironmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a reusable plastic container system that replaces single-use corrugated boxes. The containers are designed to be collected, cleaned, and reused multiple times in the supply chain, thereby recovering and reutilizing the packaging material instead of discarding it after single use, which reduces environmental impact while maintaining manufacturing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

2Quantity of substance

If corrugated boxes are packed with 41.5 lbs of green fruit, then the net weight specification is met, but the container load approaches both weight limit and cubic space limit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenet weightVSAvoidcontainer load weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the packaging parameters by using lighter-weight reusable plastic containers with optimized dimensions. The new container design allows for adjusted fruit packing parameters that maintain the required net weight specification while reducing the overall container load weight and optimizing cubic space utilization in the refrigerated container

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If bananas are packed in 4 lines or rows with crowns and inner whirl down, then the net weight specification is met, but the height of the fruit exceeds the height of the box causing high pack damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenet weightVSAvoidhigh pack damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a traditional 4-line packing arrangement to a 3-line configuration within the reusable plastic container. This dimensional reorganization of the packing layout, combined with the container's optimized height specification, accommodates the banana clusters more effectively and prevents high pack damage while maintaining the required net weight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Strength

If telescoping lid is used to facilitate high pack, then stacking strength is improved, but the stacking load is transferred directly through the bananas causing damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestacking strengthVSAvoidstacking load damage
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent specifies an optimized container height parameter that eliminates the need for telescoping lids to accommodate high pack. The container is designed with sufficient internal height to contain the 3-line banana arrangement without exceeding the box walls, thereby preventing direct transfer of stacking load through the bananas while maintaining adequate stacking strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Duration of action of stationary object

If conventional RPCs with 5-down footprint are used, then the containers can be reused, but the ventilation is insufficient making it difficult to control atmosphere around bananas

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereusabilityVSAvoidventilation control
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The reusable plastic container is designed with integrated ventilation features including porous walls and bottom that provide enhanced airflow throughout the container. This porous structure enables effective atmosphere control around the bananas during ripening and storage, addressing the ventilation insufficiency of conventional RPCs while maintaining reusability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

6Strength

If rigid RPC walls are used, then container strength is improved, but damage to bananas occurs due to lack of flexibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer strengthVSAvoidbanana damage
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs flexible plastic material for the container walls that provides both structural strength and compliance. The flexible shell design allows the container to adapt to the organic shape of the banana clusters, preventing damage from rigid contact while maintaining sufficient strength for stacking and handling in the supply chain

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Data Source

PatentUS20160039598A1Reusable plastic container for shipping of produce
Publication Date: 2016.02.11 ARENA PACKAGING LLC
  • US20160039598A1 patent drawing
  • US20160039598A1 patent drawing
  • US20160039598A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A collapsible, reusable plastic container that can be used for the storage and transportation of produce, having dimensions optimized for such storage and transportation and for folding down of the container. The container may also have a novel footprint for “six-down” stacking. The container may also be designed to provide increased ventilation to its contents during storage and transport. The container may also have a sample door with a clip for easy access to the produce contained in the container when it is stacked among other containers. The container may also have a latch system to secure its endwalls and sidewalls in an erected configuration during storage and transport. The container may also have lead-in in its dimensions to facilitate stacking and de-stacking of containers.