Reusable Tamper-Evident Packaging Security System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional tamper-evident systems in the packaging industry are single-use, costly, environmentally unfriendly, and vulnerable to counterfeiting, as they are destructive and made from virgin plastic, lacking effective protection against unauthorized access and replication.

Innovation Solution

A reusable tamper-evidence system comprising a housing with a lock and an access controller that moves between active and inactive positions, preventing opening in the active state and allowing it while detecting tampering in the inactive state, using a security member that changes upon movement, such as tearing or peeling, to indicate unauthorized access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional tie tags are used for tamper evidence, then packaging security is provided, but the system becomes single-use increasing per-use cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackaging securityVSAvoidper-use cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The security label is designed to be recovered and reused after the first use. After the packaging is opened and the label is removed, the label can be attached to the new packaging, maintaining security functionality across multiple uses and reducing per-use costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The label maintains its security function continuously across multiple packaging cycles. The label's security features (holographic elements, microtext, security threads) remain intact and functional after being transferred from one packaging to another, enabling continuous useful action

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

2Reliability

If conventional tie tags made from virgin plastic are used, then packaging security is provided, but environmental sustainability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepackaging securityVSAvoidenvironmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The label is designed for recovery and reuse rather than disposal. By enabling the label to be removed from one packaging and attached to another, the system reduces plastic waste and environmental impact while maintaining security functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Solution Approach 2:

The label's adhesive properties are specifically designed to allow easy removal and reattachment. The adhesive strength and bonding characteristics are optimized to enable the label to be transferred between packagings without damage, facilitating sustainable reuse

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If unique codes are provided on tie tags for authentication, then authenticity verification is enabled, but vulnerability to counterfeiting increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthenticity verificationVSAvoidcounterfeiting risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The label incorporates multiple security features including holographic elements, microtext, security threads, and other anti-counterfeiting technologies. This composite approach with multiple layers of security makes replication extremely difficult while maintaining verification capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the label contain different security features with varying levels of complexity. High-security areas with holographic elements and microtext provide localized protection against counterfeiting, while other areas maintain basic identification functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Reliability

If destructive tamper evidence systems are used, then tampering detection is provided, but packaging reusability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetampering detectionVSAvoidpackaging reusability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The label transitions from a static security feature to a dynamic one that can be removed, transferred, and reattached. This dynamic capability allows the label to adapt to multiple packaging cycles while maintaining tamper detection functionality through its security features

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The label acts as an intermediary between the packaging and the security system. It provides tamper evidence through its security features while being separable from the packaging, allowing the packaging to be reused with the same label providing continued security

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240229515A9Reusable system for securing packaging and providing tamper evidence
Publication Date: 2024.07.11 ANAND ASHISH
  • US20240229515A9 patent drawing
  • US20240229515A9 patent drawing
  • US20240229515A9 patent drawing

AI summary

A reusable system for securing packaging and providing tamper evidence is disclosed. The system may comprise a housing for securing an opening of the packaging, an access controller operably engaged to the housing and a security member. The housing may comprise a lock, wherein release of the lock may enable opening of the packaging. The access controller may be configured to operably move relative to the housing to assume positions comprising an active position and an inactive position. In the active position, the lock is prevented from being released thereby preventing the opening of the packaging. In the inactive position, the lock is releasable thereby enabling the opening of the packaging. The movement of the access controller from the active position to the inactive position causes change in the security member, wherein the change is capable of detecting tampering.