Revenue Causality Analyzer for Price Management Attribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for revenue causality analysis are inaccurate, unreliable, and inefficient, especially when dealing with multiple factors and large product sets, making it difficult to attribute changes in revenue effectively for price management.

Innovation Solution

A Revenue Causality Analyzer system that selects reference and comparison time periods, receives transaction data, prepares it by correcting errors and filling missing data, and attributes causality effects using equations for price, volume, mix, exchange, cost, dividend, and inventory effects, providing a detailed and accurate breakdown of revenue changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If current computer systems are used for revenue causality analysis, then some measure of revenue causality attribution is provided, but the analysis is inaccurate, unreliable, and requires large processing resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue causality attribution accuracyVSAvoidprocessing resources required
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the revenue causality analysis into distinct components: price effect, volume effect, mix effect, exchange effect, and cost effect. Each component is calculated separately using specific formulas, allowing for precise attribution while managing computational complexity through structured decomposition of the analysis process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the analytical parameters by introducing a standardized framework with specific计算公式 for each causality effect. This transforms the analysis from rough estimations to precise calculations by defining exact mathematical relationships between revenue changes and their causal factors, improving accuracy without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If human intuition is used to estimate causal factors, then the analysis is simple to perform, but the results are only rough estimations and inaccurate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis simplicityVSAvoidcausality attribution accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical process of human intuition and estimation with an automated computer-based calculation system. The system uses defined formulas to automatically compute price effects, volume effects, mix effects, exchange effects, and cost effects, eliminating the need for manual estimation while providing precise, reproducible results

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service automated analysis where the computer automatically performs all causality attribution calculations without requiring human intervention for computation. The framework allows businesses to input their data and receive accurate causality breakdowns autonomously, maintaining simplicity while achieving precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple causal factors are analyzed simultaneously, then comprehensive revenue attribution is achieved, but the complexity of the analysis increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive causality coverageVSAvoidanalysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the comprehensive causality analysis into five distinct segmented components: price effect, volume effect, mix effect, exchange effect, and cost effect. Each segment is calculated independently using its own formula, allowing the system to handle multiple factors simultaneously while managing complexity through structured separation of analytical components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal framework that can handle multiple types of causality factors through a standardized multi-functional approach. The same basic structure accommodates different effect types by applying appropriate formulas to each, providing comprehensive coverage without requiring separate complex analysis methods for each factor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS7904355B1Systems and methods for a revenue causality analyzer
Publication Date: 2011.03.08 VENDAVO INC
  • US7904355B1 patent drawing
  • US7904355B1 patent drawing
  • US7904355B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A revenue causality analyzer that provides attribution of causality effects for changes in revenue. The analyzer includes a selector for selecting a reference time period and a comparison time period, a receiver configured to receive transaction data including pricing data and volume data about the products at reference and comparison times, a preparer that includes a missing data exchanger and data error corrector, an attributor for attributing causality effects including a price effect, a volume effect, a mix effect an exchange effect, a cost effect, a dividend effect, a loss effect, and an inventory appreciation effect, by analyzing transaction data through a causality equation; and an output. Price effect sums the product of change in price and volume of the products across the products and currencies. Volume effect multiplies change in volume by the revenue per product sold. Mix effect multiplies percent revenue change by the volume of products sold.