Reverberation Chamber RF Production Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional reverberation chambers are cumbersome and time-consuming for production testing of electronic devices like mobile phones and laptops, leading to high uncertainty and increased costs due to the need for isotropic environments and cumbersome measurement processes.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus using a smaller reverberation chamber with inwardly facing electromagnetically reflective walls, allowing for static mode distribution configurations to measure radio frequency transmission, comparing results to a 'golden standard' device to determine device acceptability, enabling faster and more cost-effective production testing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional reverberation chambers are used for production testing, then measurement reliability is improved, but testing time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement reliabilityVSAvoidtesting speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the measurement parameters by using a limited set of predetermined mode distribution configurations instead of exhaustive measurements. This allows the system to achieve sufficient measurement reliability for production testing while dramatically reducing testing time and cost compared to conventional reverberation chamber methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by measuring only at a selected number of predetermined mode distribution configurations rather than performing complete exhaustive measurements. This partial measurement approach provides sufficient reliability for production testing while avoiding the time-consuming nature of full reverberation chamber characterization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Measurement precision

If conventional reverberation chambers are used for production testing, then measurement accuracy is improved, but chamber size and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement accuracyVSAvoidchamber complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the spatial and temporal parameters of measurement by selecting specific predetermined mode distribution configurations. This approach maintains measurement accuracy for production testing purposes while avoiding the need for large, complex conventional reverberation chambers with exhaustive measurement capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the essential measurement information needed for production testing by selecting a limited set of predetermined mode distribution configurations. This extraction approach maintains sufficient measurement accuracy while eliminating the unnecessary complexity of full reverberation chamber systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Productivity

If shielded boxes with RF absorbing materials are used, then testing speed is improved, but measurement reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting speedVSAvoidtest uncertainty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the electromagnetic environment parameter from anechoic (RF absorbing) to reverberant (reflective walls with predetermined mode distributions). This allows the system to maintain fast production testing speeds while significantly improving measurement reliability through controlled multipath signal propagation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the traditionally harmful effect of signal reflections and multipath propagation into a beneficial feature for measurement reliability. By using reflective walls and predetermined mode distribution configurations, the system transforms what would normally be interference into a means of obtaining more reliable production test results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces production testing time and cost while improving reliability in distinguishing between faulty and acceptable devices, allowing for simultaneous testing of multiple devices with reduced chamber size and complexity.

Implementation Method 1

walls having inwardly facing surfaces of an electromagnetically reflective material, thereby supporting several resonant modes within the internal cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

The signal arrives at the device under test after multiple reflections through many different trajectories

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMultipath propagation: Reflection

Implementation Method 3

By moving mode stirring plates and/or the turntable the geometry of the chamber changes, which in turn changes the fading that the signal experiences

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMode stirring:

Data Source

PatentUS11047894B2Apparatus and method for production testing of devices with wireless capability
Publication Date: 2021.06.29 BLUETEST
  • US11047894B2 patent drawing
  • US11047894B2 patent drawing
  • US11047894B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for production testing of a device under test (DUT) in a chamber is disclosed, the chamber defining an internal cavity therein, adapted to enclose the DUT, and including walls having inwardly facing surfaces of an electromagnetically reflective material, thereby supporting several resonant modes within the internal cavity. The method comprises: arranging the DUT at one or several measurement position(s) in the internal cavity; measuring radio frequency transmission between the DUT and at least one chamber antenna arranged in the internal cavity sequentially in a number of different static mode distribution configurations; comparing the measured radio frequency transmission at said predetermined mode distribution configurations with reference values obtained from measurement of a reference device arranged at the same measurement position(s) within the internal cavity, and at the same static mode distribution configurations; and determining whether the DUT is acceptable or non-acceptable based on said comparing.