Reverse Auction Platform for Cloud Resource Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cloud computing systems lack an efficient mechanism for clients to dynamically and cost-effectively select and deploy computing resources from multiple vendors, leading to suboptimal resource allocation and increased overhead in managing bids and payments.

Innovation Solution

A reverse auction system is introduced, where an intermediary manages the bidding process between clients and vendors, allowing clients to specify bid constraints and payment information, and vendors can submit bids for executing software applications on their computing resources, with the system automatically selecting the winning bid and facilitating payment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If cloud computing systems allow clients to select computing resources from multiple vendors, then resource allocation flexibility improves, but the complexity of managing bids and payments increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation flexibilityVSAvoidbid and payment management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system that manages the reverse auction process between clients and vendors. This intermediary handles bid collection, evaluation, and payment coordination, thereby maintaining resource allocation flexibility while reducing the complexity burden on individual clients and vendors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the bidding parameters from traditional forward auctions to reverse auctions, where vendors bid to provide services rather than buyers bidding to purchase. This parameter change simplifies the management complexity by standardizing the bid structure and evaluation criteria while maintaining versatility in resource selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If a reverse auction system is introduced to manage bidding between clients and vendors, then overhead for clients is reduced, but the complexity of the system architecture increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclient overheadVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The intermediary system acts as a mediator that absorbs the architectural complexity, providing clients with a simplified interface. Clients interact only with the intermediary, which handles all complex bid management, vendor coordination, and payment processing, thereby reducing client overhead while managing system complexity centrally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automated bid evaluation and winner selection algorithms that operate without manual intervention. The intermediary automatically processes vendor bids, evaluates them against client requirements, and selects winning bids, reducing the need for complex manual management procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If vendors can submit bids for executing software applications, then market access for smaller vendors improves, but the time required to process and evaluate bids increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarket accessVSAvoidbid processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system standardizes bid parameters and evaluation criteria to enable automated processing. By defining clear, structured bid formats and evaluation metrics, the system can quickly process and compare multiple vendor bids without manual intervention, thereby reducing bid processing time while maintaining fair market access for all vendors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The intermediary system automatically evaluates vendor bids using predefined criteria and algorithms, eliminating the need for manual bid review processes. This automated self-service evaluation mechanism reduces processing time significantly while ensuring consistent and fair evaluation of all vendor submissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10339600B1Application platform reverse auction
Publication Date: 2019.07.02 EMC IP HLDG CO LLC
  • US10339600B1 patent drawing
  • US10339600B1 patent drawing
  • US10339600B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for software application management includes receiving, from a client device, a software application, obtaining a software application manifest for the software application, and transmitting the software application manifest to multiple vendors. Each of the vendors includes computing system resources for hosting the software application. The method further includes receiving bids from the vendors, selecting, from the bids, a winning bid, and transmitting the software application and payment information to the vendor of the winning bid.