Reverse Circulation Debris Tool Pressure Control Valve

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Reverse circulation wellbore cleanup devices lack effective well control during deployment and retrieval, as they are prone to pressure surges from formations, which existing designs cannot adequately manage, leading to potential loss of the bottom hole assembly and the need for costly fishing operations.

Innovation Solution

A pressure control valve is integrated into the tool that can be triggered by sensors to close and isolate the well passage, preventing pressure surges from reaching the surface during tool deployment or retrieval, using various sensing mechanisms to determine the appropriate closure time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of stationary object

If the debris chamber length is increased to over 1000 meters to improve debris collection capacity, then the tool can capture more debris, but the tool develops wall openings that cannot be captured in a lubricator due to limited lubricator length, requiring isolation of the formation for running in or removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebris chamber volumeVSAvoidease of running in or removal
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The tool is divided into segments with multiple wall openings along its length, each capable of being independently isolated. This segmentation allows the tool to maintain its long debris chamber structure while enabling selective isolation of specific sections during running in or removal operations, resolving the conflict between increased capacity and operational ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-affected harmful factors

If rams are used to close off the annulus to control pressure surges, then the annulus is isolated, but pressure surges from the formation can still communicate to the surface through the open lower end of the tool

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure surge controlVSAvoidwell control reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A closure device is positioned at the lower end of the tool that can be activated preliminarily before pressure surges occur or in conjunction with annulus closure. This preliminary action of closing the tool's lower end works together with annulus isolation to provide complete well control, preventing pressure surge communication to the surface and improving overall well control reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If shear rams are used to control severe pressure events, then pressure control is achieved, but the bottom hole assembly is lost and requires fishing operations for retrieval

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure event controlVSAvoidbottom hole assembly loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The closure device at the lower end of the tool is designed as a sacrificial component that can be set to close permanently or temporarily. In severe pressure events, this closure device can be activated to seal the tool's lower end, providing pressure control without requiring shear rams that would sacrifice the bottom hole assembly. This eliminates the need for costly fishing operations while maintaining effective pressure control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The valve effectively manages well pressure excursions, preventing loss of the bottom hole assembly and eliminating the need for shear rams, thereby ensuring safe and efficient tool operation and retrieval, even for long debris chambers.

Implementation Method 1

a sensor that detects a predetermined condition to shut the isolation valve within the tool housing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure sensing: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

an eductor powered by tubing flow from the surface to draw debris laden flow into the bottom of the tool. The flow enters through an inlet tube surrounded by a debris reservoir. The heavier debris settles into the reservoir while smaller debris continues up the tool drawn by the eductor fluid inlet at which there is a reduced pressure due to the connected motive fluid.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEductor effect: Venturi Effect

Implementation Method 3

A reverse circulation debris cleanup tool has a pressure control valve that closes up a passage through the body based on a sensed well condition to help pressure control the well when rams close around the tool to isolate the surrounding annulus.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure control: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS10677005B2Reverse circulation debris removal tool with well control feature
Publication Date: 2020.06.09 BAKER HUGHES CO
  • US10677005B2 patent drawing
  • US10677005B2 patent drawing
  • US10677005B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A reverse circulation debris cleanup tool has a pressure control valve that closes up a passage through the body based on a sensed well condition to help pressure control the well when rams close around the tool to isolate the surrounding annulus. The sensor can hold the valve open for a predetermined time to allow debris removal operations and then close. The debris chamber below an eductor in a VACS tool can be thousands of feet long and the valve can provide protection during running in or removal of the tool from well pressure events so as to avoid using shear rams and losing the bottom hole assembly in the borehole and a fishing operation to get it out.