Reverse DRM Geo-Fencing UAV Privacy Enforcement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies lack a secure mechanism to enforce privacy policies for drones operating in specific geo-fenced areas, failing to protect citizens' privacy rights and requiring sophisticated agency representation, which is not yet developed.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a reverse DRM geo-fencing system with UAVs equipped with sensors and a reverse DRM geo-fence policy enforcement manager, along with a base station that generates and enforces policies, authenticates drones, and ensures compliance, using a trusted execution environment to protect against tampering.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional DRM geo-fencing is used to restrict drone operation, then privacy protection is improved, but drone operational freedom deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoiddrone operational freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional DRM approach by implementing reverse DRM geo-fencing where the drone itself enforces privacy policies rather than being passively restricted. The drone's RDGFPE manager actively monitors its own operations and enforces geo-fence policies, transforming the drone from a restricted object into an active policy enforcer that protects privacy while maintaining operational freedom.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The drone performs self-service by using its own RDGFPE manager to enforce privacy policies and geo-fence restrictions. Instead of requiring external control systems or continuous monitoring by authorities, the drone autonomously determines whether it is operating within authorized zones and takes appropriate actions to comply with privacy policies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Object-affected harmful factors

If government agencies create laws to control drone operators, then privacy protection is improved, but system complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the privacy enforcement function from complex government agencies and regulatory bodies, embedding it directly into the drone's RDGFPE manager. This extraction eliminates the need for sophisticated agency representation and complex regulatory infrastructure, as the enforcement capability is now intrinsic to the drone itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The RDGFPE manager acts as an intermediary between privacy policy requirements and drone operation. It translates high-level privacy policies into specific operational constraints that the drone can enforce, eliminating the need for direct government intervention while maintaining effective privacy protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If authentication and policy enforcement mechanisms are implemented, then privacy protection is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidease of drone operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-configuring the drone with an RDGFPE manager that contains authentication capabilities and geo-fence policy enforcement logic before the drone operates. The drone automatically authenticates and enforces policies without requiring real-time intervention, making the process transparent to the operator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The drone's RDGFPE manager handles authentication and policy enforcement autonomously without requiring operator intervention. The system self-services by automatically determining compliance status and taking corrective actions, maintaining ease of operation while ensuring privacy protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10158671B2Reverse DRM geo-fencing of UAV method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2018.12.18 INTEL CORP
  • US10158671B2 patent drawing
  • US10158671B2 patent drawing
  • US10158671B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatuses, methods and storage medium associated with reverse DRM geo-fencing are disclosed. In embodiments, an UAV may comprise sensors to provide sensor data for aerial operation over or near a geographic area, and collect sensor data of a target within the geographic area, and a reverse DRM geo-fence policy enforcement manager to enforce reverse DRM geo-fence policies on operation of the sensors while the UAV operates over/near the geographic area. In other embodiments, a base station may include a reverse DRM geo-fence policy generator to instruct an UAV to enforce reverse DRM geo-fence policies on operation of sensors of the UAV on collecting sensor data of the target within the geographic area while the UAV operates over or near the geographic area. Other embodiments may be disclosed or claimed.