Reverse Flotation of Silica at Natural pH for Iron Oxide Concentrates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mineral processing systems are costly and environmentally impactful due to the need for high pH levels to isolate iron oxides from gangue minerals, particularly silica, which is not efficiently reduced below 5% by weight, limiting the economic viability of iron oxide recovery from tailings and lean ore stockpiles.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of reverse flotation processes operating at natural pH levels between 8.0 and 8.5, using collectors like amine and frothers like methyl isobutyl carbinol, along with iron oxide depressants such as starch, to selectively float silica away from iron oxides, reducing the silica content in iron oxide concentrates while maintaining high iron recovery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If high pH levels (above 9.0) are used to isolate iron oxides from silica, then iron oxide recovery is improved, but reagent costs increase and environmental impact worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveiron oxide recoveryVSAvoidenvironmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the pH parameter from conventional high levels (above 9.0) to a lower range (7.5-8.5), which is near the natural pH of iron oxide slurries. This parameter change allows effective silica removal while avoiding the need for expensive alkaline reagents and reducing environmental harm. The modified flotation process achieves comparable iron recovery at the lower pH level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces expensive, environmentally harmful alkaline reagents (such as lime and caustic soda) with cheaper, more environmentally benign alternatives. The process uses minimal reagent dosages and relies on the natural pH characteristics of the slurry, thereby reducing both operational costs and environmental footprint while maintaining effective silica removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Reliability

If high pH levels (above 9.0) are used to remove silica, then iron oxide isolation is improved, but reagent costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesilica removal efficiencyVSAvoidreagent cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the pH parameter from conventional high levels (above 9.0) to a lower range (7.5-8.5), which is near the natural pH of iron oxide slurries. This parameter change allows effective silica removal while avoiding the need for expensive alkaline reagents and reducing environmental harm. The modified flotation process achieves comparable iron recovery at the lower pH level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces expensive, environmentally harmful alkaline reagents (such as lime and caustic soda) with cheaper, more environmentally benign alternatives. The process uses minimal reagent dosages and relies on the natural pH characteristics of the slurry, thereby reducing both operational costs and environmental footprint while maintaining effective silica removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If conventional flotation processes are used to remove silica, then iron oxide concentration is improved, but silica content remains above 5% by weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveiron oxide concentrationVSAvoidsilica content reduction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the pH parameter from conventional high levels (above 9.0) to a lower range (7.5-8.5), which is near the natural pH of iron oxide slurries. This parameter change allows effective silica removal while avoiding the need for expensive alkaline reagents and reducing environmental harm. The modified flotation process achieves comparable iron recovery at the lower pH level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces expensive, environmentally harmful alkaline reagents (such as lime and caustic soda) with cheaper, more environmentally benign alternatives. The process uses minimal reagent dosages and relies on the natural pH characteristics of the slurry, thereby reducing both operational costs and environmental footprint while maintaining effective silica removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces silica content below 5% by weight in iron oxide concentrates, lowering reagent costs and environmental impact, making the process more economically and environmentally sustainable while maintaining high iron recovery rates.

Implementation Method 1

reverse flotation processes where the gangue mineral silica is floated to the froth

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlotation: Froth Floatation

Data Source

PatentUS10201816B2Methods, devices, systems and processes for upgrading iron oxide concentrates using reverse flotation of silica at a natural pH
Publication Date: 2019.02.12 MAGGLOBAL LLC
  • US10201816B2 patent drawing
  • US10201816B2 patent drawing
  • US10201816B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Cationic reverse flotation methods, systems, and processes for producing a marketable iron oxide concentrate from an iron oxide mineral slurry (“treatment slurry”), wherein the iron oxide content of the concentrate is greater than the iron oxide content of the treatment slurry, include introducing the treatment slurry into a flotation cell, together with a collector, a frother and optionally an iron oxide depressant, and recovering two flow streams from the flotation cell, namely a froth fraction (also referred to as a flotation tail fraction) and a sink material fraction (also referred to as the flotation concentrate), wherein the treatment slurry in the flotation cell is maintained at a Natural pH.