Reverse Flow Combustor Liner with Compound-Angle Frustoconical Geometry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing gas turbine combustors face challenges in optimizing both combustion characteristics and airflow around the combustor due to engine configuration constraints, often requiring trade-offs that affect efficiency and performance while increasing costs and weight.

Innovation Solution

A reverse flow combustor design featuring an outer and inner liner with a compound-angle frustoconical portion, where the first conical slope is greater than the second, optimizing airflow and combustion volume by maintaining clearance between the liner and diffuser, and incorporating effusion cooling and butt welds for manufacturing efficiency and lightweight construction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If a conventional combustor design is used, then the combustion volume can be optimized, but the airflow around the combustor cannot be optimized simultaneously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion volumeVSAvoidairflow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The outer liner is segmented into multiple sections with different geometric characteristics: a cylindrical section for combustion volume optimization and a compound-angle frustoconical section for airflow optimization. This segmentation allows each section to be optimized for its specific function independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The transition from cylindrical to frustoconical geometry introduces a dimensional change in the liner shape, enabling the combustor to adapt to different functional requirements in different spatial regions while maintaining both combustion volume and airflow efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If the combustor design is made more complex to optimize both combustion and airflow, then performance improves, but manufacturing cost and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine efficiencyVSAvoidcombustor structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The design uses parameter changes in the geometric configuration, specifically the compound-angle frustoconical section with varying conical slopes, to optimize airflow while maintaining manufacturing simplicity. This allows performance improvement without proportionally increasing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the combustor design is made more complex to optimize both combustion and airflow, then performance improves, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The compound-angle frustoconical section uses straightforward geometric parameter changes that can be efficiently manufactured using conventional machining operations, avoiding the need for complex manufacturing processes while still achieving airflow optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If the combustor design is made more complex to optimize both combustion and airflow, then performance improves, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine efficiencyVSAvoidcombustor weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The design optimizes the geometric parameters of the outer liner sections to achieve the required functional performance with minimal material usage, thereby reducing weight while maintaining or improving engine efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design enhances the overall efficiency and performance of the gas turbine engine by optimizing airflow and combustion, reducing weight and manufacturing costs through a low-cost, lightweight sheet metal solution that maintains airflow integrity and provides localized cooling.

Implementation Method 1

the compound-angle frustoconical portion including a first frustoconical portion extending from the cylindrical head portion and having a first conical slope towards an engine centreline and a second frustoconical portion extending from the first frustoconical portion and having a second conical slope towards the engine centreline, the first conical slope being greater than the second conical slope

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow pattern optimization:

Implementation Method 2

incorporating effusion cooling and butt welds for manufacturing efficiency and lightweight construction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEffusion cooling: Effusion

Data Source

PatentUS8794005B2Combustor construction
Publication Date: 2014.08.05 PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP
  • US8794005B2 patent drawing
  • US8794005B2 patent drawing
  • US8794005B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A reverse flow combustor for a gas turbine engine having an outer combustor liner and an inner combustor liner defining an annular combustion chamber, and a compound-angle frustoconical portion in the outer liner having a first and second conical slopes towards an engine centerline.