Reverse Logistics RMA Matching for Return Discrepancy Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Reverse logistics operations face challenges in maintaining accuracy and productivity due to errors in product data and physical mismatches during the processing of returned goods, leading to increased costs and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented system and method for managing reverse logistics information, which includes receiving RMAs and actual product data, automatically detecting discrepancies, and holding or correcting major discrepancies while allowing minor ones to proceed, ensuring timely and accurate processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual validation and correction processes are used for RMA discrepancies, then accuracy can be improved, but productivity decreases due to increased processing time and labor requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccuracyVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual validation and correction processes with an automated computer-implemented system that uses data matching algorithms to detect and correct discrepancies between RMA information and actual returned products. This substitution of mechanical human labor with automated computational processes maintains high accuracy in discrepancy detection while significantly improving processing speed and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically detecting and correcting its own errors through automated data matching and discrepancy identification. The computer-implemented system autonomously validates RMA information against actual product data, corrects minor discrepancies automatically, and only flags major discrepancies for manual review, thereby maintaining accuracy while eliminating the need for continuous manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If all discrepancies are corrected before processing, then accuracy is improved, but productivity decreases due to holding products for correction

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial correction by distinguishing between minor and major discrepancies. Minor discrepancies are corrected automatically without halting processing, while only major discrepancies require manual intervention and product holding. This selective approach ensures accuracy for critical errors while maintaining productivity by allowing non-critical processing to continue uninterrupted.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary automated correction of minor discrepancies before products reach manual processing stages. By pre-correcting identifiable errors through automated data matching and validation rules, the system ensures accuracy is improved for routine cases while minimizing the time products are held for correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual processing is used for all RMAs, then flexibility and adaptability are improved, but productivity decreases due to labor-intensive operations

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The computer-implemented system provides universal functionality by handling multiple RMA validation, discrepancy detection, automatic correction, and manual review routing through a single integrated platform. This multi-functional system replaces multiple manual processing steps while maintaining flexibility to adapt to different RMA types and discrepancy scenarios, thereby improving productivity without sacrificing adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its processing approach based on the type and severity of discrepancies detected. It automatically corrects minor discrepancies, routes major discrepancies for manual review, and adapts its validation rules based on RMA-specific requirements. This dynamic behavior maintains the flexibility needed for diverse RMA scenarios while eliminating the productivity limitations of purely manual processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Measurement precision

If RMA information is validated at multiple stages, then accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional validation steps

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccuracyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the validation process into distinct automated stages: initial RMA data validation, matching against actual product data during receiving, discrepancy detection and classification, and selective routing for manual review. This segmentation of complex validation tasks into manageable automated steps improves accuracy through systematic checking while reducing perceived complexity by automating each segment and providing clear process flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12536493B2System and method for reverse logistics operations
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 FUNAI SERVICE CORP
  • US12536493B2 patent drawing
  • US12536493B2 patent drawing
  • US12536493B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for securely managing reverse logistics information of returned products includes the steps of receiving a plurality of Return Merchandise Authorizations (RMAs) each with returned product information from a return party, and receiving return product information taken from actual returned product of a shipment received by the return processing party. It is automatically determined whether there is a discrepancy between the returned product information for a related one of the RMAS from the return party and the actual return product information from the shipment taken by the return processing party. If a minor discrepancy is determined, a record is automatically saving of the minor discrepancy and processing the actual returned product having the minor discrepancy is continued. If a major discrepancy is determined, the actual returned product having the major discrepancy is automatically held from further processing.